Chemical Abortion

Pro-lifers recognize surgical abortion as killing humans, but not all of them recognize the scope of the problem presenting as chemical abortion. Generally we  recognize  mifepristone, the chemical formerly known as RU-486. The initial name of the drug  stayed with us, (the same as with the Artist formerly known as Prince).  Mifepristone is best known in the U.S. for its function to kill unborn humans during the embryonic stage, up to 49 days of pregnancy, although it has other investigational uses.

Meet the TWINS!  Ulipristal acetate and Mifepristone.  As you can see, they’re not quite identical, but very close. Both are selective progesterone receptor modulators.


Mifepristone, RU-486 is the most regulated drug in the U.S. Pharmacists don’t dispense it. It’s supposed to be dispensed only by physicians, directly to patients. In China and other countries it has been used as a morning after pill, as well as a killer of later embryos and early fetuses.

Those astute drug companies knew that this drug would not sell as a morning after pill in the U.S. That’s why we have it’s TWIN, Ulipristal Acetate, approved  by the FDA  in August , 2010,  and brought to us in by Watson Pharmaceuticals in December of the same year.  Watson also distributes Next Choice, generic of the original form of Plan B.

At 0.5mg/kg, Ulipristal Acetate, marketed as ELLA, is usable as a morning after pill. It’s marketed as an inhibitor of ovulation, but the manufacturer admits that the operative mechanism depends on the timing of its use. Like RU-486, Ulipristone is an anti-progesterone. It stops the action of that hormone in the reproductive tract, inhibits proliferation of the endometrium, inhibits implantation, and kills the embryo.

Click for MORE

 

Idaho Pharmacist Refused to Dispense Planned Parenthood Prescription Cleared of Wrongdoing

Planned Parenthood continues its harassment of an Idaho Pharmacist who refused to dispense an order for methergine, nor give a referral.

The media, acting as mouthpiece for Planned Parenthood’s version of the story gives the following outline.

The pharmacist took a call from planned parenthood about an order for methergine (which is used to stem bleeding after delivery, miscarriage, abortion). The pharmacist is said to have asked if this was related to an abortion procedure. The planned parenthood nurse would not answer, citing the privacy of the patient.
The pharmacist allegedly refused to take the order, and also did not refer the nurse to another pharmacy. She is said to have hung up the phone on planned parenthood.  (smile). And ask yourself why planned parenthood is doing abortions without this hemostatic drug on the premises. Isn’t that dangerous?

We do not have the pharmacist’s version of the story. We do have the people at Second Hand Smoke weighing in on this case, and pondering whether the pharmacist did the right thing, and was within the scope of Idaho pharmacy practice standards. As many of them had insufficient data and background to address this topic,  Pharmer was only too happy to assist them in their cogitations as follows:

Someone thinks that oral methergine is going to sufficiently address the kind of uncontrolled bleeding that can kill a patient in minutes.

Another person thinks that pharmacists should not have the patient’s medical history.

Without information as to what is being treated, the pharmacist can’t check the safety and appropriateness of the prescription. Under these conditions, the prescription should not be filled.

There are some people who should avoid health care practice due to incompetence.

At my place of employment I correct numerous physician orders each shift. This is a necessary part of my job function as a pharmacist. I also tell the physicians and nurses how to use the meds (to avoid these errors). When I was a retail pharmacist, I obtained changes in prescriptions on a regular basis. I refused to fill some prescriptions due to dangerous drug interactions, etc. I refused to stock and dispense Redux, which is now off the market, because I knew better than the FDA, at the time, that taking this drug was not worth the risk.

The pharmacist in this case was correct to refuse a prescription from a prescriber who was unwilling to verify that the prescription was within the scope of his or her practice. Pharmacists need that information to know if the prescription is legitimate and “legal to dispense”. In addition, prescriptions from Planned Parenthood should be scrutinized to see if they really have been authorized by a licensed prescriber. It appears from the story that the Planned Parenthood agent was not being cooperative with respect to providing information relevant to the prescription, and the pharmacist may have had good legal and clinical reason to avoid taking the order. Not much is really known about this case since the info is coming mainly from planned parenthood, and its media mouthpiece.

If a woman came to me AFTER the fact with a prescription for methergine, I would fill it, (and have done that in retail practice). At that time, the drug is not a part of the abortion procedure.

I would not fill a prescription which could be preliminary or a part of the actual abortion regimen.

With the availability of Ella, (ulipristal acetate) which operates in the same way as RU-486- (mifepristone), there will be many related conundrums for hospitals which don’t normally do abortions. Ulipristal at 0.5mg/kg is used as a morning after pill. The doses can be combined to use for later chemical abortions. Expect many “miscarraiges”, “missed ABs”, D&Cs to be followed up at legitimate hospitals after the woman has used ulipristal to kill her baby in the embryonic stage of development. This is a significant reason for bringing Ella to market as a morning after pill: to allow its “off label” use and finish up chemical abortions at legitimate facilities, thus dodging much of the stigma and personal $ cost associated with abortion. It is also a means to deal with the decreasing supply of abortionists.

The Idaho board has ruled that the pharmacist broke no state laws in alleged refusal to fill the prescription.

Planned Parenthood continues to harass the pharmacist by threatening to file a complaint with federal agencies.  This  is not likely to go anywhere, as this part of pharmacy practice is governed by state law.

Planned Parenthood also stuck its nose in the business of  the Pharmer  by intervening in an employment issue in which it had no legal standing.  This organization has a long history of using your tax money  (which accounts for at least a third of its income) to harass pro-life health care professionals in many different states.

Planned Parenthood has, for many years been involved in canvassing operations to locate pro-life pharmacists.  Pharmer has  received calls  to this end, and told the callers to do their own research.   Planned parenthood has sent people to “sting” CPCs and pro-life health care professionals.   For us, there is poetic justice in seeing the work of LiveAction.org, and seeing it reveal publicly  what we’ve heard all along from their dissatisfied clientele.

*Compare the Planned Parenthood complaint to the Idaho Pharmacy Board with the media feed on this issue.    Hook- Line and Sinker.

New 5-Day ‘Morning-After’ Pill Tested For U.S. Approval

New 5-Day ‘Morning-After’ Pill Tested For U.S. Approval.

Two useful bits of information in the above article, from  a tech news site (Physorg).

1) EllaOne, the new morning after pill from Europe is being tested for approval in the United States.

2) It’s efficacy in killing the early human embryo does not decrease over the 5 day period after sex, in which it is recommended for use.

Some  of the  Physorg  commentators  had sufficient education to recognize that the mechanism of EllaOne involves causing death of  the early human embryo.   Hat’s off to them.

Some  of the comments appended to the article are from those who  were unable to part from a religious notion that they could distinguish which humans had been ensouled by developmental stage.    These might  be drained  from the human gene pool  over time, by means of EllaOne, perhaps, despite Pharmer’s recommendations to the contrary.

As a progesterone receptor modulator with low glucocorticoid activity,   ulipristal   gained attractiveness as a birth control drug primarily due to its ability to cause endometrial atrophy.  That means, from a birth control standpoint :  no place for the human embryo to implant.

*** ulipristal  ellaone ella-one  ella one sprm

BOGUS Medical News: Novel ‘Morning-After’ Pill Works for Five Days – in OB/Gyn, Pregnancy from MedPage Today

Medical News: Novel ‘Morning-After’ Pill Works for Five Days – in OB/Gyn, Pregnancy from MedPage Today

More ineffective birth control is being marketed to women in Europe. This new morning after pill, Ella One, containing ulipristal 30mg, is said to be useful for up to 120 hours (5 days) AFTER intercourse.

The study (1241 women) mentioned in this article indicates that ulipristal reduces the pregnancy rate from the expected 5.5 percent down to 2.1 percent.

In this study, the women who used the pill later after intercourse had lower pregnancy rates than the earlier users, though the differences among the groups were not statistically significant. If a larger study were to replicate this trend within statistical significance it would add more evidence for the pill’s post fertilization effects. Those who understand the reproductive processes find it intuitively obvious that pills reducing pregnancy rate AFTER intercourse work to a significant degree by killing the embryo shortly after it is formed.

That ethical problem aside, women should be aware that a pill reducing the pregnancy rate from 5.5 percent to 2.1 percent should not be considered reliable.

The data here indicates that it fails to stop nearly 40 percent of the pregnancies, under study conditions with more education and oversight than usual circumstances.

*** ulipristal  ellaone ella-one  ella one sprm ella 1  ella1