On the Advance of Civilization

The United States is at a cross roads. Some of our representatives have gotten a hold of this idea. They have correctly recognized that social issues and economic issues of the United States are intertwined, and that the social issues have to be addressed in order for the economic issues to be resolved.

This is the reason:

The Advance of Human Civilization is fueled by the desire to alleviate human suffering and human need.
If the suffering and need are concealed or erased by killing the victims, there will be no advancement.

We can see this already happening in the countries with socialized medicine. They have decided to stop treatment, and/or kill off those who have too many difficulties, or whose existence is not seen as profitable for the society as a whole. You can see what has happened to their capacities for medical and others scientific innovation. Which country still fosters the most scientific advancement, so that the most gifted people of the world flock here in order to accomplish their aims? It is still U.S.

If we decide to kill people because they have unmet needs, we will cease to advance as a civilization. All sorts of innovations will grind to a halt. We will enter a prolonged depression and dark age.

Listen to the likes of Bachmann, Palin, Cain, West, and the ones who came before them. They have a gut understanding of the main point, given above, though they might not be able to express it in as few words.
These people have the charisma to convey a more hopeful future for humanity, and lead others to it.

-K. L. Brauer

» Fed Policy Burns Down the Middle East, Who’s Next? – Big Government

» Fed Policy Burns Down the Middle East, Who’s Next? – Big Government.

Long ago Pharmer commented upon the idea of using corn to make ethanol for fuel.  1) It would raise the price of beer as demand for all kinds of grain rose in relation to supply. 2)  Food prices would go up. 3) Most significantly, people in other countries would be made to Starve, because food is so much harder to obtain in the poorest countries.  The  U.S.  formerly the breadbasket of the world, closed off much of the supply by converting it to fuel.

The above article connects the inflation of food prices caused by our “quantitative easing”, inflationary policies with exacerbated misery throughout the world.   We only use a portion of our income for food, so when that price goes up, we’re unhappy, but not in severe danger.  Such is not the case for the third world where people spend the bulk of their income on food.  They are made much more miserable by irresponsible spending and fiscal policy of the United States.  Rioting in the Middle East is being attributed to the pressures felt by people who are much more drastically affected by inflationary prices of food.

Please remind your Leftist Democrat friends of these things  when they speak of their party as the one with compassion for the poor.