The media is all over Santorum for saying something about Obama’s false religion of ‘climate change’ not being Bible based.
Could it be SAaaaTAAAAAAAAN!???
Pharmer imagines many media figures with heads spinning 360 degrees, as they express pretended shock over Santorum speaking of the time honored concept of personified evil.
Above you can see Robert Gibbs telling Chrissie Matthews one thing, then Bill Ayers saying the opposite regarding that seminal moment at Ayres place, where a fundraiser was held for Obama at the outset of his career.
John Nolte at Big Journalism gives a thorough presentation of this contradiction. He explains how the media is much too busy with Sarah Palin’s emails, and Herman Cain’s supposed sex life, and Newt’s past divorces, and a nasty, old painted rock on land leased by Perry’s father, to be concerned that Obama had support and close association with the convicted and unrepentant, domestic terrorist, Bill Ayers.
Also contained in Nolte’s article are the accusations against Palin and McCain when their campaign revealed this past element of Obama’s political career.
Very Briefly, here’s the Quote attributed by the Politico to Palin, though she never said it. The Politico has retracted it, acknowledging that the words come from the authors of the piece, not from Palin.
Palin’s bus tour had some of the hallmarks of a primal scream: “I built this constituency, not Bachmann, not anyone else.” Looking at it through her eyes, she has a point.
The apparent purpose of the misattribution was to invent a fight between Palin and Bachmann which has not occurred.
The United States is at a cross roads. Some of our representatives have gotten a hold of this idea. They have correctly recognized that social issues and economic issues of the United States are intertwined, and that the social issues have to be addressed in order for the economic issues to be resolved.
This is the reason:
The Advance of Human Civilization is fueled by the desire to alleviate human suffering and human need.
If the suffering and need are concealed or erased by killing the victims, there will be no advancement.
We can see this already happening in the countries with socialized medicine. They have decided to stop treatment, and/or kill off those who have too many difficulties, or whose existence is not seen as profitable for the society as a whole. You can see what has happened to their capacities for medical and others scientific innovation. Which country still fosters the most scientific advancement, so that the most gifted people of the world flock here in order to accomplish their aims? It is still U.S.
If we decide to kill people because they have unmet needs, we will cease to advance as a civilization. All sorts of innovations will grind to a halt. We will enter a prolonged depression and dark age.
Listen to the likes of Bachmann, Palin, Cain, West, and the ones who came before them. They have a gut understanding of the main point, given above, though they might not be able to express it in as few words.
These people have the charisma to convey a more hopeful future for humanity, and lead others to it.
Palin is too nice to say that feminists have enslaved women, but she has the correct general idea about them.
Her comment to Krauthammer and the RINO’s is worth hearing, as well as her habit of talking over interruptions. (Alan Keyes is also known to do that.) It’s the proper way for conservatives to utilize interview time and live spots on television and radio.
Liberals want to give away YOUR money, not theirs. Hence, Bidens, as in the past, are still tightwads in the charitable giving department.
Of $333,000 official income in 2009, Bidens gave $4,820 , or 1.4$.
The Obamas, who were more attentive to catching up with the Palins, gave a higher percentage of their $5.5 million income last year: 329,ooo or 5.9 percent.
Pharmer doesn’t think either of the families can keep up with Sarah and Todd, however. For one example, Sarah forked over her entire Ohio Right to Life speaker’s fee (after tax portion) to the pro-life cause which she was supporting at the event on March 5th.
The president of Cal State Stanislaus, Hamid Shirvani believes that the documents, used by students to create some controversy about a Palin speaking engagement, were stolen.
Shirvani says he has asked Palin about the speaking fee, but Pharmer has a better suggestion for obtaining the information.
The Washington Speakers Bureau has a better idea of the fee for each speech that Sarah Palin gives, because they generate the charges, and these vary by location. Palin’s personal take is not the total amount of the fees.
I hope this information is helpful for Dr. Hamid Shirvani in dealing with this attack on his perfectly legal fund raising efforts from the Atty General Brown, and liberal state Senator Leland Yee.