Now that whacky Judge Korman has removed the morning after pill, Plan B or Plan B One-Step from pharmacist purview altogether, it might therefore be treated by the pharmacists as an unhealthy thing, not to be sold in pharmacy environments at all. There are various over the counter products which are regarded by us to be ineffective and/or deleterious quack remedies, not worthy of being associated with any health care practice. Tobacco, ma huang (Ephedra sinica), and bitter orange have been deleted from the stock of pharmacies for health reasons. Many pharmacists have relegated homeopathic remedies to the trash heap, on account of the infinitesimal chance that the recipient might be ingesting or applying an active medicinal ingredient.
The levonorgestrel in Plan B (U.S.) and Levonelle (U.K), is likely the least reliable hormonal birth control drug on the market. It’s less than 60 percent effective per use, and is in a race with ulipristal acetate, or Ella, to the bottom. Repeated reliance on this drug is likely to soon result in pregnancy, with the embryonic baby clinging to life, awash in an unbalanced mix of hormones. Might not pharmacists be doing their patients a favor by telling them that this drug is too much of an unreliable, (and unethical) mess to be used for birth control?
Plan B
15
May 13
Is Plan B Worthy of Pharmacy Shelf Space?
10
May 13
Life Dynamics and Jill Stanek: Groundbreaking Legal Means to Stop Child Predators
As many pro-lifers know, Jill Stanek has joined with Life Dynamics to report news on the life issues. She’s now reporting on a groundbreaking push by Life Dynamics to hold the abortion industry accountable for concealing the sexual abuse of minors.
This blog has repeatedly referred to the first study, done more than 10 years ago by Life Dynamics, which revealed that over 90 percent of abortion clinics, who were called by an actress portraying a 13 year old girl with 22 year old boyfriend, showed a willingness to flout the laws requiring reporting of suspected sexual abuse of minors. Many of these abortion clinics even provided the methodology to conceal the sexual abuse.
Now Life Dynamics has mailed CDs to 53 thousand personal injury attorneys to educate them on the state laws pertinent to this issue, and the possibility of bringing suit against school officials, health care professionals and clinics which provide services to minors who have been sexually abused by adults, and fail in their legal requirement to report such abuse to the state.
Jill Stanek reports that Mark Crutcher’s phone at Life Dynamics has been ringing incessantly ever since launching this campaign.
Your friendly Pharmer suggests that further rich ground for the lawyers exists and that fear of litigation can dissuade retail pharmacies from stocking Plan B and Ella.
The government can force retailers to sell these drugs to the sexual predators, only if they stock the drug.
In the future, lawsuits might be the tool to stop the government from forcing retailers to stock these drugs. None of the businesses could survive a group of civil lawsuits for aiding sexual predators.
Currently good target states for this kind of litigation are Washington, Oregon and of course, New York. The large retail pharmacy chains would run screaming to the State Boards of Pharmacy for relief from the governments requirement to sell these drugs to minor females and their rapists.
Life Dynamics Facebook Announcement of the Campaign to Educate Personal Injury Attorneys.
WND Article explains Life Dyanamics Campaign to Legally Restrain the Enablers of Child Sex Abuse
9
Dec 12
(Another) Pharmacist Refuses to Sell Morning After Pill to a Man
Quite a significant number of pharmacists prefer to sell the morning after pills only to the actual patient. If you search the net, you’ll find a fair number of stories detailing this phenomenon.
Apparently a recent story has made the news and has a bit of buzz on the blogs. Seems that “Hilary and Jon” had a desire for the morning after pill. They’re not yet married, and apparently not ready to have a baby. Jon was surprised to encounter a female pharmacist who would not sell the drug to him.
Some people have no idea why a pharmacist, who is willing to sell those pills, would make that decision. The girls at Reality Check seem to fall into this group. So Pharmer made an attempt to explain this to them, and added a bit of extra bonus information.
1) Many formerly over the counter remedies have been placed in restricted access due to abuse. All cold remedies containing pseudoephedrine are now behind the pharmacist’s counter, and sales are restricted, because people like to use that chemical to produce methamphetamine.
2) The morning after pills are sometimes abused by males, who give them to females without their consent, sometimes as a chaser to “date rape” drugs. Because of this, it makes sense to restrict the sale of the morning after pills to men. Congratulations to the pharmacist who had enough sense to understand this, and take a stand to protect women.
3) It is misbranding to refer to a drug as “contraception” if it does not significantly stop or delay ovulation during or after the luteal peak (during the most fertile time of the month). Part of its action is due to mechanisms operating after fertilization. The morning after pills are properly classed as “hormonal birth control”, not “contraception”.
4) The morning after pills have shown MUCH less effectiveness than was initially claimed. It makes NO sense for a woman to change sexual behavior due to reliance on the morning after pills. They reduce pregnancy rates by about 60 percent, or LESS.
5) In general, the effect of marketing ulipristal acetate, and levonorgestrel as morning-after-pills will be to stem the decline of the abortion rate. The spectre of increasingly abysmal medical care, overlaid by ever increasing drug shortages has possibly killed the mood for a lot of women, leading to a dip in abortion demand in the U.S. Heavily marketing a poorer quality birth control option might be enough to keep the abortion businesses alive. Levonorgestrel MAP was strongly associated with that effect in Anna Glasier’s Scottish studies.
Pharmer finds the morning after pills to be problematic on a number of levels, ranging from ethics to efficacy, and doesn’t dispense them at all.
22
Sep 12
Appellate Court Upholds Decision Protecting Pharmacists of Concience in Illinois
Court: Illinois Can't Force Pharmacists to Sell Plan B Drug | LifeNews.com.
The 2005 Blagojevich edict forcing pharmacists to dispense the morning after pill and all other birth control drugs without question or delay, suffered a second defeat, this time in appellate court. In 2011 the trial court had found that the law was invalid because it targeted a specific group, and that Illinois law prohibits discrimination in licensing those who cannot provide a particular service due to religious beliefs.
This lawsuit, which passed its second review, was the one involving pharmacy owners, Luke VanderBleek and Glenn Kosirog. Another lawsuit, which ended in favor of conscientious objectors, involved employee pharmacists in the same state.
The Appellate court opinion is available HERE.
VanderBleek and Kosirog have been represented since 2005 by attorneys of the ACLJ and the Becket Fund.
7
Jun 12
For NYT, Evaluating Birth Control Mechanisms is Classed as POLITICAL SCIENCE
Science at Issue in Debate on Morning-After Pill – NYTimes.com.
Pharmer is immensely amused by the NYT Political Science article purporting that Plan B, levonorgestrel (a progestin – synthetic progesterone analog) delays ovulation but has no effect upon post fertilization mechanisms. This claim certainly has a relationship to political ideology, but not to pharmacological science.
There is the suggestion that Plan B can operate to impede ovulation even when taken 72 hours after intercourse.
The usual life of sperm is 48 hours, and The usual lifespan of secondary oocytes (eggs) is 1 day. The most fertile time for a woman is the day of, and the day after ovulation.
Laughably entertaining is the suggestion that there is no time for levonorgestrel to affect thickness or receptivity of the uterine lining, but there is time for it to always work by delaying ovulation. Scroll back up to the lifespan of the gametes and THEN ponder that it takes about 7 days for the early human embryo to travel down the fallopian tubes into the uterus and implant in the uterine lining.
Seven days is not long enough for the morning after pill to affect feedback inhibition, transport, endometrial tissue, and implantation processes, yet 48 hours is claimed to be long enough to exert a perfect 100 percent mechanism for delaying ovulation so that sperm and ‘egg’ don’t meet. (Remember when a woman is most fertile, the day of and the day after ovulation?) It’s pathetic when leftist ideology replaces scientific analysis and inquiry in such a blatantly obvious manner.
James Trussell (population controller of Princeton) has changed his tune about the efficacy of Plan B. Now he wants to say that the pill is ridiculously ineffective, so that condoms, rhythm, and withdrawal are far superior in efficacy as birth control. This is what he needs to admit in order to claim that the Plan B doesn’t work if a woman has ovulated.
Progesterone hormones have multiple mechanisms of action. Progesterone receptors are found in various tissues, and their preponderance and activity undergo cyclic changes. These hormones largely affect gene expression. These effects are not instantaneous. The physiological effects of progestins on reproduction vary with the timing of their use. The morning after pill’s modes of action will vary depending on when in the cycle and how long after intercourse they are used.
One cannot prescribe progestins to patients to mitigate hypermenorrhea (excessive bleeding), and at the same time claim that they don’t affect the uterine lining.
Progestins given on a scheduled basis fail to prevent ovulation in about half of patients. This has been attached to the labeling of progestin only pills, which have been used to control excessive bleeding, as well as to prevent pregnancy.
Plan B is a progestin. Ella is a selective progesterone receptor blocker (like mifepristone, RU456). Each one will affect the reproductive processes in different, dose dependent and time dependent ways. Political Science author Pam Belluck needs to consider the drugs separately when attempting to evaluate them mechanistically.
Plan B, levonorgestrel, like ALL hormones, operates on many physiological processes, by many different means.
If the leftists ever manage to develop effective birth control drugs which operate ONLY by preventing the union of sperm and egg, we may proceed with the constitutional amendments to accurately define human life with no further impediments.
More at Jill Stanek’s place. and right HERE.
23
Feb 12
Federal judge says Washington State cannot force pharmacies to sell morning after pill
Governor Christine Gregoire is expected to appeal the federal court ruling which supports the pharmacists’ right to not dispense Plan B for reasons of conscience.
Judge Ronald Leighton noted that Washington state accepted all sorts of secular reasons for not stocking or dispensing a drug, but excluded conscience reasons. He declared the application of their rules to force pharmacists to dispense morning after pills to be unconstitutional. He noted that the Washington Board of Pharmacy stocking rules were “designed to force religious objectors to dispense Plan B.”
Judge Leighton had originally blocked the application of the dispensing rule to make Stormans’ pharmacy carry Plan B, but that was overturned by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which remanded the case back to Leighton. After an 11 day trial, this new opinion was issued, which Leighton says has been created with a skeptical appeals court in mind.
Kevin Stormans, owner of Ralph’s Thriftway pharmacy and fellow pharmacists have been waging a legal battle since 2007, with the aid of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, and Seattle law firm of Ellis, Li & McKinstry.
Pharmer congratulates these courageous Washington Pharmacists on their legal victory, and prays for their continued success.
See the Ruling by Judge Ron Leighton HERE.
10
Feb 12
Dana Goldstein: Transfer Oversight of Your Sex Life From Your Boss to the Government
via Obama Birth Control Compromise Defuses Religion Issue – The Daily Beast.
Above linked is an address in favor of Obama’s new shell game “solution” to the fight with the religious people of the United States.
It’s just as bogus and unsustainable as the rest of Obamacare. Instead of forcing the religious institutions to pay for birth control, abortive drugs and sterilizations, he moves the cost to the insurers, which in turn move the cost back to the employers. The only change is that the employers do not have to speak to their employees about birth control. Obama is still making businesses sell specific products, and making the citizens pay for those products. UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
Pharmer is laughing at Dana Goldstein, of the Daily Beast, who think’s its not rational that a woman’s boss has influence over her sex life. She does think it’s more rational that the influence be transferred to the Government.
There are two to three generations of lefties completely convinced that there is a right for humans to have sex, and that someone else should have to fund the activity and the results: erectile dysfunction meds, birth control, sexually transmitted diseases, infertility, child birth, abortions, etc. I think that human rights end where another human begins. Sex involves two people at least, and can make more.
From the Pharmer comes a more libertarian viewpoint. Why can’t people assume more responsibility for their own behaviors and consequences?? The total cost of health care would go down if people knew that they had to take care of their own sex life and its results.
Third party payment is what has made the cost of health care (and education too) skyrocket, with no return on the extra investment. People are almost never good stewards of other people’s money.
Consider this novel idea… people delay sex until they can foot the bills. Birth control should be paid for in cash, and the same for sex enhancers and drugs for erectile dysfunction. People can enter their choice of insurance pools for to soften the expenses for complications of reproduction. That can be handled in a way similar to dental or life insurance. The cost of reproductive health care would plummet.
Certainly this would not appeal to the lefties who are used to trading in all their other freedoms in order to have sex with people they don’t even like, (or with children).
Maybe those who are interested in freedom and self determination should give the idea of personal responsibility another look.
7
Feb 12
So the Frat Boys and Jocks Can Buy Plan-B For Their “Dates”
Shippensburg University To Offer Plan B Contraception From Vending Machine « CBS Philly.
You know….. those “Dates”, where several guys take advantage of a single intoxicated girl ( often of questionable age)? Now the guys can put a couple of different drugs into her drink and GET ER DONE!!!! Classy Shippensburg University in Pennsylvania will have Plan B One-Step in the health center vending machine, for the sake of privacy. Shippensburg is now the no-tell motel, and it vends the date-rape drug.
Parents might wish to check the plan B policies of universities and colleges before sending their kids out of town for school. The policy reflects an attitude towards how the female students, and underage females in the vicinity are to be utilized.
Shippensburg issued a statement dated 2/7/12 regarding their policy of vending Plan B.
13
Dec 11
Is Judge Ed a Ped?
Judge to Determine if Pre-teens Can Buy Morning After Pill | LifeNews.com.
Unfortunately we have been allowing too many medically ignorant people to make legal decisions regarding health. (We’ve also seen some of their writing invade the medical journals.) Pharmer sometimes speaks with politicians about drug issues. Even the ones who are making a sincere effort to understand get the glazed-eyes look when pelted with too much medicinal chemistry and pharmacology. Others are simply disinterested in drug mechanisms of action and their relative risks and benefits. A third group overlaps, which has an agenda of increasing sexual access to younger girls, and increasing abortion business by this means. They have political supporters to pay off.
A New York Federal Judge, Edward Korman has agreed to hear a case from from the Center for Reproductive “Rights” on whether the morning after pill should be placed out on store shelves. This case was filed before the Sebelius decision regarding Plan B.
Judge Edward Korman had previously ordered the FDA to let seventeen year olds obtain the medication without a prescription, so Pharmer already feels that he likes them pretty young, at or just after the legal age of consent.
The next question is whether or not Judge Ed likes them VERY young, before they have the ability to form the first dimple of cellulite in the adipose padding of the female curvatures. Is Judge Ed a Ped?
Pro-life people have to pay a social price for not wanting to participate in killing humans. We are ostracized, less employable, and pelted with every sort of obscene epithet and accusation. Some do jail time for peaceful protesting, while the much more violent leftie protesters are left to trash public and private property as they please. There is one law for pro-lifers and another for the lefties.
The usual response from our side is to try to be sooooo nice and hope that the lefties learn to love us. Someone needs to tell the USCCB , the Republican party, and various other pro-life groups that this will never happen. (Soon they might be where the Egyptian Coptic Christians are now.)
Pharmer is not in the mood to be nice to sexual predators, and those who profit from them.
Maybe Judge Ed will wake up and determine that it is just too sick to let guys buy or steal these pills so easily and use them on drugged out pre-teen runaways who have been pressed into prostitution.
But if he doesn’t…. it would mean that there’s something hugely wrong with him and his family, that they’re abnormal. Should your kids be allowed anywhere near such people? Would you want to be known to socially prefer the company of sex perverts? Would you then feel safe in Judge Korman’s neighborhood or want him at your school functions?
These are the things which need to be decided. What kind of world to you want to live in? What will you do to adjust your environment so that it doesn’t deteriorate any further? People who are interested in the well being of their children should be protecting them from the ones who think that it’s OK for an 11 year old to be having sex and buying plan B with their school lunch money, or being fed with the pills by sexual predators.
10
Dec 11
Planned Parenthood: Adapted to the Sebelius Plan B Decision
Does Planned Parenthood Secretly Support the Plan B Decision? | LifeNews.com.
There is conjecture that Planned Parenthood might not have minded Kathleen Sebelius’ decision not to permit the sale of Plan B out on store shelves.
In reality, Planned Parenthood is trying to increase its market share of the surgical and chemical abortion businesses. Selling Plan B One-Step out on the store shelves everywhere would accomplish this.
Plan B is not very effective. If girls and women are using it more, Planned Parenthood would sell more abortions. So they probably preferred that decision over the opposite.
There is a reason why Planned Parenthood did not have such an extreme shrieking response as some other abortophilic groups. It was already a prime distributor of this relatively INeffective birth control drug, and this business will continue. The profit margin is huge and the relative liability risk is small. Planned Parenthood will not gain the increased abortion business which was expected if Plan B had been made extremely easy to buy or steal, but that is offset by the fact that they will remain a front running distributor.
It is very possible that Sebelius would change her mind regarding Plan B if Obama is reelected in 2012. Holding this out to Planned Parenthood might induce them to continue forking over the campaign support.
8
Dec 11
Mental Meanderings– The 180 Degree Turn on Plan B
Yesterday was interesting. There was a call from “Maggie” who wanted to know if the Pharmer would speak with ABC News reporters (for Diane Sawyer’s program) concerning the FDA’s idea to allow Plan B to be sold on store shelves. This was said to be a followup to a story from LONG ago featuring yours truly.
The ever agreeable Pharmer said “yes”, and mentioned that the FDA should be concentrating on the rampant shortage of essential medications, rather than messing around with Plan B. “Maggie” said there would be a call back to time the interview. ………. That, of course, was not to be, because VOILA!! The story changed radically and they likely no longer wanted to parade the weird pro-life pharmacist , who does not wish to kill humans at any stage of development.
So. to those who think the lefties are not happy with the results, and their party was squashed, and they need a Waaaaambulance…….. You are CORRECT, and that includes the mainstream media.
The lefties are wailing and gnashing their teeth about pre-teens and men not being able to purchase or steal Plan B from the shelves. It’s been fun to read their comments on some of the news sites.
Pharmer originally thought Sebelius possibly felt she had collected enough barnacles and “bad Karma” in Kansas, with respect to facilitating the abuse of minors, abusing Phill Kline, and “losing” documents. She perhaps no longer wanted that to be highlighted and discussed everywhere she looks. So perhaps she decided to give her agenda a rest for once.
Another alternative idea is that Sebelius is actually recalcitrant, and wanted to allow the FDA decision to fly. Perhaps she was ordered from above to countermand the FDA recommendation, and WAIT TILL AFTER THE ELECTION to allow it.
From a practical standpoint, the items which are often stolen wind up being locked up in stores. Plan B One-Step would be one of these, because a person can easily break into the box, take the pill and leave the empty container with it’s little alarm device still inside. So perhaps it would not be placed out with the condoms after all.
7
Dec 11
Sebelius Overrules FDA: Refuses to Place Plan B Out on Store Shelves
Plan B: Sebelius Overrules FDA, Nixes Sale Without ID.
Above is an insane article written for Web MD, by Daniel J DeNoon, bemoaning that Kathleen Sebelius has overruled the even crazier FDA regarding their plan allow sale Plan B out on the shelves next to the condoms. DeNoon demonstrates his medical incompetence by pretending to give the mechanisms of Plan B action, but failing to remember the one, listed in manufacturers information to the providers, which causes controversy. The article uses “urban legend” in reference to obvious consequences of making Plan B easily available. The author also appears unaware of the studies showing NO decrease in demand for abortion resulting from increased availability of Plan B.
Kathleen Sebelius has been under fire for years, due to her cozy relationship with Planned Parenthood and late term abortionist George Tiller, while governor of Kansas. Her background troubles include shady dealings with States attorneys general, persecuting one of them for investigating abortion clinics for failing to report abortions done on minors, and shredded documents pertaining to these investigations.
She is also involved in denying medicare and medicaid funding for states which refuse to fund Planned Parenthood with tax dollars.
Perhaps in an act of self interest, Sebelius has decided not to add fuel to the fire of accusations against her, aiding and abetting the abuse of minors, through her association with the abortion industry.
Placing Plan B One-Step where men can easily buy it, for use in unsuspecting sex partners, or abuse victims is a problem so obvious, Sebelius could see it. Even without this easy availability, this drug and other chemical abortion drugs have been used on women without their consent.
Medscape should anticipate some backlash for posting the above over the counter, Plan B advocacy article, as it severely reduces confidence in their other content.
If you would like to send comments: news@medscape.net.
If you would like to see other abortion advocates admitting to what DeNoon does not know, or purposely conceals, click the Abortion Review.
17
Nov 11
‘I can’t give you the morning-after pill… it’s against my religion’ – Local – Hartlepool Mail
‘I can’t give you the morning-after pill… it’s against my religion’ – Local – Hartlepool Mail.
Another conscientious Boots Pharmacist acts up. A 29 year old female patient, who desired to remain anonymous, was refused the morning after pill at a Boots pharmacy in Middleton Grange Shopping Centre, Hartlepool, UK.
She left the pharmacy in a state of shock, and was apparently not able to get her pills until two days later.
Boots pharmacies has dealt with this issue before, and their spokesman acknowledges that the employees have a right to exercise conscientious objection, in refusing to dispense certain drugs.
The above linked article fails to recognize the manufacturer’s stated multiple mechanisms of the morning after pills, and dishonestly states only that they operate to “stop the ovaries from releasing eggs”.
15
Aug 11
AZ court upholds limits on abortion
AZ court upholds limits on abortion.
Jivin J over at Jill Stanek’s found this news, of an Arizona appeals court upholding that state’s new abortion limitations.
Nurse practitioners are no longer allowed to do the mifepristone abortions. Waiting periods remain in place, and pharmacists right of conscience is upheld with respect to other abortive drugs: the morning after pills.
This is a BIG deal, as the criterion of “undue burden” for women is defined more stringently. The fact that the law allows some burden on those seeking abortion is not sufficient for the law to be overturned.
*Note: Mifepristone, RU-486, is dispensed by the prescriber or his agent, not pharmacists. However the chemical analog, ulipristal acetate, or Ella, a morning after pill, is able to be dispensed by pharmacists.
29
Apr 11
Blagojevich Rule Challenged | Daily News | NCRegister.com
Blagojevich Rule Challenged | Daily News | NCRegister.com.
In Sangamon County, Circuit Court Judge John Belz ruled that Illinois pharmacists can’t be forced to dispense the morning after pills against their own ethical standards and religious beliefs.
Opponents promise to immediately challenge this ruling, but Atty. Francis J. Manion, ACLJ senior counsel, who represented the conscientiously objecting pharmacists notes that the court ruling addresses specific arguments for which the Illinois state attorneys were not able to provide evidence. For example, they were not able to argue that a single woman had been prevented from obtaining her morning after pills by a pharmacist who would not personally provide them. For that reason, an appeal on their part will likely be a waste of Illinois’ negative financial resources.
The Illinois edict, which was overturned in the circuit court, had basically been designed by Planned Parenthood, and this is the case for many other unconstitutional state laws opposing the human rights of health care professionals.
The article linked addresses the battle over conscience rights in numerous other states, including Wisconsin, Washington, where the pharmacists are in trouble, and in several more states which have recently supported pharmacists of conscience.
Scroll down in this blog to see the prescriber information for Plan B, which clearly contradicts the false premise of the Wisconsin regulations, forcing pharmacists to dispense Plan B (as well as all other hormonal birth control). Expect a new legal battle to erupt in that state as the pharmacy owners are forced to apply the legislation and fire conscientiously objecting pharmacists. Wisconsin’s legislation targeting the pharmacists was hidden in budget bills by the democrat legislature, and passed without much notice. The newer state government might find cost containment benefits in rescinding the legislation.
The legal battle is ongoing in the state of Washington, which the pro-abortion Governor Gregoire and her Board of Pharmacy might drive all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. It might be the crowning achievement of their careers.
7
Apr 11
Mo. House backs changes on abortion drugs, Plan B – Missouri | State & regional – bnd.com
Mo. House backs changes on abortion drugs, Plan B – Missouri | State & regional – bnd.com.
A law which prevents pharmacists and pharmacies from being forced to stock or dispense the morning after pills has passed the Missouri State house of representatives.
6
Apr 11
Pharmacy Owners Prevail in Court Decision on Blagojevich Edict
Illinois Pharmacy Owners have emerged victorious after six years of litigation against the state of Illinois edict compelling them to dispense the morning after pill.
This comes shortly after the approval of a new morning after pill, Ella, which is an analog of RU486, mifepristone.
Francis J Manion of the ACLJ, and Mark Rienzi, of Catholic University’s Columbus School of Law teamed up as counsel to the pharmacy owners.
Deposed Governor Blagojevich’s original order addressing individual pharmacists had previously been overturned.
Judge Belz noted that the government had made no effort to advance it’s supposed interest in supplying morning after pills to women prior to April 2010, and had specifically targeted pharmacists of conscience and their religious beliefs.
Pharmacists for Life International has stored the original letter from Blagojevich which threatened pharmacists with loss of their license to practice if they did not dispense the morning after pill and all other hormonal birth control products and contraceptives upon demand.
The coverage in the Chicago Tribune is very brief, does not mention the newest morning after pill, and does not mention that the original order to the pharmacists was for them to dispense all drugs labeled as “contraceptives” though most are misbranded. It does mention an expected (hoped for) appeal to the case.
10
Jan 11
The Ideological Opponents Bow to Pharmer’s Correctness
;-)
“Stephanie Kunkel, executive director of the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, says her organization is taking the initiative “seriously,” pointing out that the amendment could lead to bans on birth control.”
Yes, the girls at planned unparenthood acknowledge, after years of denial, the correctness of pharmacists who avoided dispensing various hormonal forms of birth control, in order to avoid involvment in killing humans- very early in development.
Recognizing that humanity is intrinsic, from the very start of development, would cause BIRTH CONTROL PILLS to be outlawed, they fret.
“If passed, the result would not only ban abortion, but would go so far as to ban most common forms of birth control. … .”
Thank you for acknowledging that hormonal birth control can operate by interceptive/abortive mechanisms, GRRRLS.
29
Jun 10
Woman uses Morning After Pill to kill Embryonic Humans after Fertility Clinic Mixup
Woman uses emergency contraceptive to kill wrongly implanted babies by Jill Stanek.
For those of you who are confused about the mechanism of the morning after pill, this drug was used to kill embryos which were mistakenly placed into the wrong woman. Obviously it was the wrong woman…….. since she decided to kill them.
The error at a University of Connecticut fertility clinic, in which embryos belonging to one woman were placed in the wrong patient, was discovered within an hour, and the patient decided to take the morning after pill to stop the pregnancy.
Read the original NBC story on this 2009 error, apparently “erased” by the only morning after pill on the market at that time: Plan B.
Next time you are told the lie, that the morning after pill works only by stopping/delaying ovulation, please remember that NBC informed you otherwise. OOPS!!!
23
Mar 10
Cochrane review: Morning After Pills
Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention ——– DOES NOT REDUCE PREGNANCY RATES in the populations studied.
However the reviewers conclude that it should be available anyway. (Child molesters need to have access to them).
The review claims….. studies compare populations with prescription availability to populations with over the counter availability.
The review authors do not know how the morning after pills work, and therefore misbrand them as emergency contraceptives, as does the increasingly useless US FDA.
The Center for Reproductive Rights, ever attentive to the needs of pedophiles, is encouraging the FDA to extend over the counter availability to minor girls, though there is no data on effects in this population, and particularly the long term safety. Trot over to Jill Stanek’s blog for that video and the rest of the story.
6
Feb 10
Military Hospitals Forced to Stock Morning After Pill
We’ve seen the opposition to the Tebow Superbowl ad, by the pro-aborts who have supported Obama throughout his career. We know that the health and self determination of women is not uppermost in the mind of this administration. We’ve known for decades that “Choice” would become coercion, and that time is upon us now.
On the heels of the aborted attempt to punish military women who become pregnant, is this latest assault on the health of women as well as the conscience rights of health care providers.
Military hospitals will be forced to stock and dispense the Morning After Pill.
First, let it be understood that the Morning After Pills possess an interceptive mechanism to stop the early embryo from implanting. Those who claim otherwise are demonstrating that they don’t understand reproductive processes, and cannot be relied upon to provide competent gynecological care. (Note that while the Plan B One-Step site admits to the embryocidal mechanisms, there is a postulation that pregnancy starts after implantation, and this is for the purpose of deception.)
Next, all of those who would object to embryonic stem cell research should, for the exact same reason, find the morning after pills to be an unacceptable form of contraception.
Third, let it be understood that the efficacy of the morning after pills is quite poor in actual use, and is most closely comparable to the withdrawal method over time. The manufacturers have ceased comparing the efficacy of either plan B product to other contraceptive methods in the provider information leaflets . Its ready availability and use is NOT associated with a reduction in the demand for surgical abortions.
Let anyone whose consciences will be trampled by the latest edict of the Obama administration seek legal assistance quickly. Health care professionals who are adversely affected by this decision can email Pharmer . The primary site for obtaining information and assistance has ALWAYS been Pharmacists for Life International.
The future health and autonomy of women depends upon the continued ability of conscientious health care professionals to continue in their practices. Without our presence, women will lose their option to Choose Life.
[shari]
.
20
Jan 10
What to Do when Plan B is Seen as Less Effective than Withdrawal?
Well, rehabilitate the withdrawal method of course! So check out this ABC article which cites studies to “show” that the withdrawal method is on par with condom use for efficacy in preventing pregnancy.
Obviously it won’t help with other common problems…….
So with withdrawal rehabilitated to acceptability as a contraceptive method, then Plan B might still be thought of as “effective”.
Or maybe getting both of these into common usage will sell a lot more abortions.





