LeRoy Carhart, Late Term Abortionist on Board of Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice

Methodist, Episcopal, Presbyterian Churches Tied to Late-Term Abortion Doc | LifeNews.com.

Susan Michelle Tyrrell has been outing Churches  affiliated with the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, the pro-abortion group which lobbies for this as well as legitimization of gay marriages. In her latest article she reveals that late term abortionist LeRoy Carhart is on the board of directors of the RCRC. Carhart has been looking for a new place to land since Nebraska passed fetal pain legislation which prohibits abortion after 20 weeks. He’s been trying to open new clinics in states which allow his special killing skills.

You can click HERE to see pics of Leroy Carhart’s homey and inviting Nebraska abortion facility. You’ll be impressed.  Operation Rescue called it the “Dumpatorium”.  As an added treat, you’ll also see the Carharts at the 2007 party that Kathleen Sebelius threw for abortionist George Tiller.

Reading the  historical timeline of the RCRC might convince members of the Presbyterian, United Methodist, and Episcopal Churches that they ought to do something about their affiliation with this organization and with one of the most notorious late term abortionists, LeRoy Carhart.    Click HERE for a full list of the member churches.

Calling on the faithful to avoid funding the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice:

United Methodist Church pro-abortion ideology might have aborted Jesus | Bound4LIFE

Where are your kids going on school field trips? Check up!

Another Motivation for the Tea Party

There have been numerous theories concerning the motivation for Supreme Court Justice John Roberts to excuse the Obamacare insurance mandate penalty as a TAX, and allow Obamacare to continue its job of destroying personal freedom and the U.S. economy.

Here’s a theory that Pharmer has not heard yet, and it seems fairly plausible. Supreme Court watchers suspected from the way the decisions were written, that Roberts had originally opposed the insurance mandate, and that he changed his mind.

Pharmer suspects that Roberts was influenced by old establishment Republicans seeking to galvanize the Tea Partiers behind Romney.

This judicial precedent has inflicted widespread damage.

What should be the response? Conservatives will probably have to choose Romney in order to get rid of Obama. That’s an emergency.

The Tea Party should stay very active in removing crusty old establishment Republicans from their government posts at the National, State and Local levels in all subsequent primary elections. Pharmer intends to assist in this continuing effort.

7/2 Update:  CBS claims to have sources ‘revealing’ that John Roberts changed his opinion one month prior to announcing the Supreme court decision.  There is a claim that Justice Kennedy tried hard to bring him back into line with the conservative judges.

Of significant mention is the treatment by many that Roberts’  insistence that the commerce clause does not justify the insurance mandate is significant in the decision.   In actuality, Roberts opinion on this is a Dictum, and, as such,  it has no value as judicial precedent.  Roberts provided exactly zero judicial  protection against the further encroachment of government on our liberties.

The self flagellators  wish to hang on Roberts’ words that the Court has no job to protect the people from their bad choices of governmental representatives.  (Perhaps he desired to have George W Bush, who appointed him, classified as a bad choice.)

Roberts must  bear  personal responsibility for his own  bad decision,  and  Tea Partiers  hope to place it on the ash heap of history.

Tea Party as Safe Haven for Gays.

David Lampo, VP of the Log Cabin Republicans, makes an appeal for the Tea Party to address and support gay legal “equality”. He seems to have overlooked that legal equality between males and females has never existed, mainly because the sexes are not the same. (Note the current hot issue of sex selection abortions.) The most optimum social condition would be that the sexes are regarded and respected as equally valued humans.

Take a look at Lampo’s appeal, (which is not exactly libertarian) here:

Lampo: Is the Tea Party Nation Anti-Gay? | TheBlaze.com.

Pharmer understands the more immediately practical reasons why gay people join Tea Party side, under current social conditions.

There are numerous gay people who understand that it’s safer and more sensible to side with conservatives for both social and economic reasons.

Many conservatives disagree with the kind of sex that gay people prefer, but are infinitely less likely to cull gays from the human herd through health care rationing and abortion, (should a propensity towards gayness ever become prenatally diagnosable).
Conservatives will respect the rights of gays to remain alive, because they are human.

The lefties, often due to reflexive hatred of Christianity, have made friends with extreme groups who have shown a propensity for stoning or chopping the heads off of gay people.

Which is worse, having a finger wagged at you, or being killed? Yes, no matter your sex preference, it is safer to hang around people who think that willfully killing humans is wrong.

Now Obamacare Faces the Religious Freedom Challenges

Becket Fund’s HHS Mandate Challenge | Becket Fund.

There are dozens of federal lawsuits based upon the violations of human rights, that are expressed in the Sebelius HHS Mandate of Obamacare. At issue is its funding of birth control, sterilization and abortion, by forcing people to pay for it in violation of their religion. Obamacare also provides these services to minors without parental consent. Alliance Defense Fund has a fact sheet explaining these aspects of Obamacare.

The Colson center outlines the coming legal challenges to Obamacare in an article HERE.

In addition to religious affiliated organizations, private businesses owned by people of conscience are also filing suit against the Obamacare mandate, for example, O’Brien Industrial Holdings, LLC, represented by the American Center for Law and Justice.

House holds Holder in contempt over ‘Fast and Furious’ documents – Washington Times

House holds Holder in contempt over 'Fast and Furious' documents – Washington Times.

An interesting statistic is that only 17 Democrats voted to hold Eric Holder in criminal contempt of Congress, for his withholding of documents pertaining to the case, and for lying on more than one occasion. An additional 5 Dems, for a total of 21 voted to pursue a civil contempt case against Holder in court.

One expects that these Democrats will not be partying at the DNC convention in North Carolina.

Rand Paul Attends to His Promises to Pro-lifers

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul Holds Up Vote on Flood Insurance So That He Can Get a Vote on Whether Life Begins at Conception | TheBlaze.com.

FEMA flood insurance funding requires an vote to continue it for the next five years.

Rand Paul is attempting to force the Senate to address the issue of when human life begins, in order to proceed with funding the flood insurance.

Reid is not wanting to allow this amendment to the flood insurance funding, since the Dems would not want to acknowledge biological facts in conjunction with continuing a government spending program.

Supreme Court Says OBAMA LIED

See the video and transcript linked below, in which Obama explains that his promise not to tax the middle class is good, because the mandated purchase of healthcare insurance (soon to be from the government only) is not a tax.

Obama: Mandate is Not a Tax – ABC News.

But today, THE SUPREME COURT DIFFERS, and has upheld obamacare with the argument (from Obama’s lawyers) that the mandated health care purchase IS a tax.

So, Middle Class, Obama is taxing the crap out of you, even though he promised not to, and the Supreme Court says he’s allowed to.

Hospital and healthcare stocks went up (for the reason that people don’t understand what Obamacare will eventually do to these entities). Insurance stocks fell, because most investors know that Obamacare is designed to kill them.

Pharmer believes that Republican and Tea Party chances in November have increased due to this decision.

Justice John Roberts move to the left is not really a move, in the eyes of those who have been watching him. Pharmer remembers the left leaning David Souter, who had been expected to be more conservative when he was nominated. We have something similar in Roberts, and can expect further difficulties on account of him.

The reason SCOTUS gives for accepting Obamacare, that Congress is allowed to tax us to death, can become the reason for rejecting most of the incumbents of Congress. It’s time to clean house.

If you’re wanting to torture yourself with the details, Here are the opinions of the Supreme Court on Obamacare.

SEE THE CIRCUS:

See the very classy Tweets from top DNC staffers, celebrating their short lived victory.

One might say that the media was not expecting the Supreme Court to approve Obama’s NEW TAX on the middle class. See the Gaffes HERE!

Over the preceding months Congress has been amassing a good deal of testimony from various members of the Obama administration concerning the nature of the mandate to purchase health insurance. Even during the time that the Obama lawyers argued in favor of the new tax before the Supreme Court, they were telling us that it was not a tax. Sebelius had the most amusing story… it operates as a tax but it is not a tax.

Not to worry, it will feel like a tax, because you will get little to no return on your “investment”.