Category: abortion

The Problem Was with Putting the Baby’s Corpse Under The Christmas Tree

~ Pharmer

Strange but true…….. the main social difficulty that our pro abortion law recognizes is that the corpse was placed under the Christmas Tree.  Throwing similar bodies in a dumpster, generally will not result in significant penalty, as those in the abortion industry are well aware.

Very briefly,  Ruby Lee Medina induced an abortion-by-early-delivery of her baby at 7 months gestation, using misoprostil  (a drug sometimes used in medical abortions following mifepristone or methotrexate).   Sometime during or after this procedure, the baby died, and the corpse was cleaned and placed under the Christmas tree at the abode shared with her significant other, Javier Gonzalez.

If early induction abortion is carried out in this manner at hospitals,  there is no legal problem so long as the baby is born dead.   If the baby is born alive, a law (rarely enforced) is in place to ensure that the infant is given care, and not killed or left to die of exposure. 

The Illinois version of the above mentioned federal law was vehemently opposed by the current commander in chief,  Barack Hussein Obama. 

In other words,   inducing an early delivery of a baby at late term, and leaving him or her to die is OK with Obama, and he might only have difficulty with the sanitary practices concerning temporary storage of the body under the Christmas tree.   Or he might have difficulty with calling a Christmas tree by that name.

Again, killing a late term baby shortly before, during or shortly after birth is OK by Obama.   So, if you voted for this monster,  let your hearts not be troubled, but perhaps write to object to any legal penalties for the couple who killed their baby at their home.

DASCHLE Resigns.

~ Pharmer

Tax problems aren’t the only difficulty for Tom Daschle, the Obama nominee for Health and Human Services Secretary. Apparently his lucrative speaking engagements within the health care industry were considered too much for the Senate to ignore. I expect that the tax issue was only the tip of the iceberg.

Talk Radio lit up with Obama’s tax cheating cabinet appointees, and a replaying of a past Daschle statement that tax cheaters should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

One IRS employee called in to a talk show, saying that the agency is recieving a good deal of mail stating that the writers would pay taxes after Obama’s tax cheating nominees did.

Tax revolt is in the air, and Obama has no clue. His ongoing problem is finding sufficiently leftist nominees who don’t cheat and steal, as well as the potentially explosive Blagojevich and Rezko problem, continuing to ferment in Illinois.

Pelosi at odds with Japanese company

~ Pharmer ~ 2 Comments

Speaker of the House, Pelosi, is being roundly castigated for her statement in a Stephanopoulos interview that contraception is needed to cut costs in this declining economy. Remember that for the Democrats, any method is OK for reducing the number of children who require government assistance: birth control, abortion, and our new president has supported the practice of infanticide in his home state.

Pelosi is convinced that the government cannot support the children of this class of dependent people who supported Obama. It’s necessary to make these people stop having babies. Killing off 50 percent of Black Babies in the U.S. is not enough. There needs to be further injection of federal funds (your tax dollars) into the family planning (abortion) industry. While the average age of Americans at death has risen to 78, Pelosi wishes to cut out the basis of the ponzi social security plan, by reducing the number of young people.

Japan, now having only 1.34 kids per couple has figured out that cutting births is not helping their economy. For years, the various governmental bodies have been providing financial incentives for making babies. Now the private industry is offering assistance, with Canon now sending its workers home early (5:30 pm) for two days a week, for the express purpose of being with their families (i.e., MAKING BABIES).

Is Nancy Pelosi crazy? Absolutely.

There’s a possibility that even some democrats realize this, as they’re thinking of dropping crazy birth control funding from the stimulus package.

~ Pharmer

In a routine internet search for the news, I followed a link to a fascinating New York Times article “Palin fuses motherhood and politics in a new way”. The author, Jodi Kantor carefully avoids the more obvious abuse of Sarah Palin by the media, concerning her ability to simultaneously serve as mother and public official. However this quote caught my eye: “In just a few months, she has gone from hiding her pregnancy from those closest to her to toting her infant on stage at the Republican National Convention.”

As a prolife mother, I feel it’s my place to explain to reporters another significant reason why a woman, sharing my beliefs about abortion, might conceal a pregnancy when there is an untoward fetal diagnosis. Each time a mom like us mentions that her unborn child has been diagnosed with a disability, she risks hearing the suggestion that she ought to abort. This suggestion might come from coworkers, friends or even family members. With it comes a piece of information that we’d rather not know: someone we care about believes that it’s OK to kill a baby prior to birth. It’s a sad bit of news, each time it happens. Even having a few kids in rapid succession as I did, later in life, can bring this kind of information.. But moms who obtain a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome are expected to abort, and 80 to 90 percent of them actually do.
I dodged most of the problems of prenatal diagnosis and the information it could have brought about people in my life. I refused the alpha-fetoprotein tests each time. It was necessary to sign a release form, since physicians (including those with don’t do abortions) need protection from the lawyers of patients who change their minds. Obstetricians are real lawyer-bait.

Other prolife moms might want to consider this. The prenatal testing isn’t mandatory, For now, it remains your Choice, whether or not to have it. Sometimes ignorance is bliss.