The Mainstream Media Finally Noticed The Disproportionately High Abortion Rate Among Black Women

Their first coverage of what Black Pro-lifers placed before them for Years, is an attempt to claim that Blacks are being used by the Pro-life movement to push our horrible agenda against killing.

Tanya M Acker blogs at CNN  that Black women don’t need help from the pro-lifers who have reported  for decades  that American Blacks are aborting at a vastly higher rate than Whites.  It’s worth giving her commentary a read, before proceeding to  the reply Pharmer  offered on that site, and below:

Both breast cancer and fetal mortality ( loss of subsequent children due to prematurity) are linked to abortion.
This might help to explain the higher incidence this author cites among Blacks.

Almost half of Black children are aborted and Alan Guttmacher Institute has recently reported that the rate of abortion among Blacks is approaching 5 times that of Whites in the U.S.

Among sexually active teens, contraceptive failure is quite high, due to notoriously imperfect compliance. and pregnancy is a  usual result within a few years.   The incidence of unplanned pregnancy and abortion in the college years are  also astronomically high. Truly, most of planned parenthood’s services become abortion related. Abby Johnson, former director of a planned parenthood clinic, informs us that this is by design. There is pressure from above to drum up more of the profitable abortion business.

The author appears to concur with Margaret Sanger that abortion is “needed” by the lower income and the minority women, hence there is approval of the location of clinics primarily in urban areas.

The assumption that abortion is most often a “freely made choice” for a woman suggests a disconnect with reality. Do women choose to be under the pressure of bad social and economic circumstances such that they feel a need to kill their unborn child?
Where are these women who have FREELY CHOSEN to kill their own offspring prior to, during, or shortly after birth?

Among abortion supporters there’s a vacillation between presenting abortion as a sad thing that some women feel they have to do, and the above suggestion that it’s just a freely taken option, (a walk in the park, no big deal).

There’s also the suggestion that Black pro-lifers who brought up this disparity decades ago, to be ignored by all except the pro-life news media, are being paternalistic. Or even the recognition from the rest of pro lifers that something is wrong with this, is considered paternalistic. In the same article is the suggestion that Blacks NEED to be CARED FOR in so many other ways, by the government, but attention to this abortion disparity, and the health problems it brings, should be ignored.

Who is being paternalistic? What good have governments done for any of the peoples, around the world, whom they have taken under the wing and to whom they have provided “care” ?

Prolife Picketers at Churches

There’s a discussion  at Jill Stanek’s Blog about prolife protesters who picket at churches, in order to  awaken a response to the abortion holocaust.

There has been a  vast body of writing  at online prolife  forums from  another most colorful   church picketer.    He is now deceased, but should not be forgotten.   The Pharm  search  division connects the dots and brings you  this 2002 article about Robert Ferguson.

Los Angeles Lay Catholic Mission | June 2002 | It’s a Lighthouse When We’re Standing Out There, by Christopher Zehnder.

A Public Relations Problem for Kaiser Permanente

News from Wilmington, CA:

That well known HMO, casting its shadow over the Western US, (and foretelling what is to come with socialized medicine), has brought itself another public relations problem.

It seems managers at Kaiser Permanente indelicately handled the dismissal of two employees
, and an over-reaction to this lead to the murder of five children followed by suicide of the parents. Indications suggest that both parents were cooperating in this plan.

While it’s not appropriate to blame good ol’ Kaiser for this tragic event, and the terrible decision of the parents, a perusal of the initial story will indicate that the company deserves the negative public relations fallout, due to their poor interactions with the dismissed employees.

For example, when firing an employee, it is best not to suggest that he should have blown his brains out, even in an indirect manner. The employee might take the suggestion literally. This might cause negative repercussions, as in the current case of the Lupoe family.

My prediction from going over the news stories is that Kaiser Permanente is going to face some questions regarding adherence to HIPAA regulations.

This is sad, sad stuff.

Mom who killed baby girl is allowed partial custody of the twin brother.

Yes, Canada’s demented child welfare and justice system allows this woman to be with this defenseless infant three days per week, AFTER she KILLED his SISTER. The U.S. system really is not reliably different.

If you are normal, this will cause nausea: The “mom” delivered a little girl, cut the cord, stuffed her into a plastic bag and left the baby to die in the trunk of her car. She then went to the hospital three days later with abdominal pain and delivered the girl’s twin brother there. The docs discovered a second cord connection on the placenta. This induced a search for the missing sibling which revealed the dead baby girl curled in a bag in the trunk of “mom’s” car.

Another blogger is noting that selective reduction of siblings in the womb (killing one or more of multiple human fetuses) is fine, according to the law.
Perhaps the court sees this fact and finds that it’s OK for the little baby boy to be left with the mother who murdered his sister.

Fortunately this blogger and the reporter who submitted the story are sufficiently shocked for me to know that some normal people remain in Canada.

Baby screened for breast cancer gene is born.

What this title really means is that any of this couple’s offspring who carried a gene, which is strongly associated with cancer in the father’s family, have been killed in order to eradicate the genetic characteristic from the family’s descendants. A baby without the gene was allowed to live until birth.

This is another example of curing disease by killing those humans which are potentially afflicted, while they are very young, perhaps at the embryonic or fetal stage.

Read an article which attempts to put a big happy face on this policy which required the demise of the Hippocratic Oath.

I wonder if this family understands the infectious origin of many cancers. They’ve only prevented one type.

Catholic Health Association and Planned Parenthood

Sister Carol Keehan, DC
President and CEO
Catholic Health Association

Dear Sister Carol Keehan,


Below is an excerpt from an admittedly prolife biased news source.

by Steven Ertelt

LifeNews.com Editor
December 10
, 2008

“Pro-life advocates know Obama has chosen another abortion activist for a key position when Planned Parenthood issues a press release saying it is “excited” about the pick.

“We also applaud the appointment of Jeanne Lambrew,” the abortion business said in a statement LifeNews.com obtained. “She is one of the leading health policy experts in the country, and someone who is an advocate for” abortion.

Planned Parenthood said Lambrew will make a good team with pro-abortion former Sen. Tom Daschle, who Obama selected as his Health and Human Services Secretary.

“We are confident that President-elect Barack Obama, incoming HHS Secretary Daschle, and Jeanne Lambrew will represent an administration committed to ensuring women’s access to” abortion, the group said.

“Planned Parenthood is excited about the opportunity of having true partners in the White House and HHS,” it added.”

It seems that you also share excitement for the appointment of Tom Daschle as HHS secretary, and Jeanne Lambrew as deputy director of a newly created White house office for health care reform as stated on the Catholic Health Alliance website : http://www.chausa.org/Pub/MainNav/Newsroom/NewsReleases/2008/r081211a.htm.

It’s not looking good for you to be publicly represented as having alignment with Planned Parenthood regarding Obama’s selection of people to oversee U.S. health care policy.

This is the link to the actual Cecile Richards statement showing excitement for the same two Obama choices which your statement
applauds. http://www.plannedparenthood.org/newsroom/politics-policy-issues/statement-cecile-richards-president-planned-parenthood-federation-america-applauding-nomination-23376.htm

Here is a google search which, on Dec 17, showed the already considerable linkage between your statement and that of Planned Parenthood.
http://www.google.com/search?q=planned+parenthood+daschle+lambrew+statement&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

You might wish to address this public relations problem. I don’t imagine that there can be much said to sway personal views IF they are really as stated in the CHA statement. However it might be useful to ask you to consider that many bishops are speaking of closing portions of Catholic health care facilities if Obama’s FOCA is passed. Alternatively, if the Bishops lack such fortitude in leading us to follow Catholic teaching on Life issues, there is the consideration that large funding sources to the Catholic health care facilities will dry up if donors discover that health care professionals within the Catholic institutions are no longer able to practice in a way that shows respect for human life, and that patients cannot rely on such respect.

There has been considerable disparity between what actually happens at some Catholic health care institutions, and Catholic teaching on the sanctity of life. I don’t think it’s good PR, however, to blur the overall distinction between Catholic health care and Planned Parenthood itself.

God Bless!

In a routine internet search for the news, I followed a link to a fascinating New York Times article “Palin fuses motherhood and politics in a new way”. The author, Jodi Kantor carefully avoids the more obvious abuse of Sarah Palin by the media, concerning her ability to simultaneously serve as mother and public official. However this quote caught my eye: “In just a few months, she has gone from hiding her pregnancy from those closest to her to toting her infant on stage at the Republican National Convention.”

As a prolife mother, I feel it’s my place to explain to reporters another significant reason why a woman, sharing my beliefs about abortion, might conceal a pregnancy when there is an untoward fetal diagnosis. Each time a mom like us mentions that her unborn child has been diagnosed with a disability, she risks hearing the suggestion that she ought to abort. This suggestion might come from coworkers, friends or even family members. With it comes a piece of information that we’d rather not know: someone we care about believes that it’s OK to kill a baby prior to birth. It’s a sad bit of news, each time it happens. Even having a few kids in rapid succession as I did, later in life, can bring this kind of information.. But moms who obtain a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome are expected to abort, and 80 to 90 percent of them actually do.
I dodged most of the problems of prenatal diagnosis and the information it could have brought about people in my life. I refused the alpha-fetoprotein tests each time. It was necessary to sign a release form, since physicians (including those with don’t do abortions) need protection from the lawyers of patients who change their minds. Obstetricians are real lawyer-bait.

Other prolife moms might want to consider this. The prenatal testing isn’t mandatory, For now, it remains your Choice, whether or not to have it. Sometimes ignorance is bliss.