Pretty many prolifers oppose abortion bans which have exceptions for health or life of the mother and incest or rape.
The reasoning, which is logical, is that these laws seem to state that it’s OK to kill some kids prior to birth.
The South Dakota ban as designed now, has clearly defined exceptions. Knowing that the abortions aren’t really done to save the life of the mother, or to preserve her health, this law will require full reporting to account for the so called medical benefits of an abortion. (It could serve to prove that there are none.). Also all of the rapes and incest will have to be reported (a new thing in actual practice, for abortionists) and DNA evidence will have to be collected. There is a 10 year penalty for abortionists who don’t comply.
This Ban, as currently defined, will be a nearly total ban for South Dakota. My bet is that all the child rapists will be heading out of state with their underage sex-slaves. Unfortunately they have a haven in KS, protected by Governor Sebelius.
Have you ever wondered why that woman is so programmed to defend sexual abuse, and abortion?
