Indiana: Just Say NO to Justice Steven David

According to the Indiana Constitution, Supreme Court  Justice Steven David is up for reappointment  by the People on Nov 6th.

JUST SAY NO to Justice Steven David.

Remember his decision to remove citizen’s right to resist unlawful entry of law enforcement officers into our homes.

Here’s the background you need to evaluate Pharmer’s advice. Click those links!

Indiana Judicial Elections, 2012  Note that Justice Robert Rucker, who dissented against the decision written by Justice Steven David, is also up for reappointment.  With respect to this particular constitutional issue, Rucker survives the flush test.

Mitch Daniels Appointee, Indiana Supreme Court Justice Steven David rules contrary to 4th Amendment

The Indiana legislative bodies and Governor Mitch Daniels (who appointed Justice David) passed another law to negate that horrible Supreme Court decision.

Effort to Undo the Indiana Supreme Court Decision Overturning 4th Amendment Rights


Mitch Daniels Appointee, Indiana Supreme Court Justice Steven David rules contrary to 4th Amendment

……. and also  contrary to common law dating back to the Magna Carta.

“Indiana Supreme Court: Police Can Unlawfully Enter A Home…No Warrant, With No Reason At All…Residents Cannot Lawfully Resist…The Fourth Amendment Under Seige” | PEOPLEUNLIKEUS.

YES, Justice Steven David is a Mitch Daniels Appointee.    Pharmer Triple Checked in order to  be certain.

This will not help Mitch Daniels in his bid to win Republican Nomination for the presidency.

Justice David is due  for a retention vote in 2012.   A judicial appointee is subjected to a retention election within two years,  the decision being made by the citizenry.  He may then serve  a term of 10 years.   It will be our job in Indiana to remove this ridiculous judge, and his compatriots Frank Sullivan (term expires 2013), and Randall Shepard  (term expires 2015).

This abominable judicial decision, penned by Justice Steven David, can be accessed below.  David has concluded that the potential violence of resisting unlawful search and arrest can be avoided by not resisting, and placing oneself in the hands of the offender.  Women are  placed in the greatest danger by this decision, as rapists will suit up in their police costumes; (they are out shopping right now);  and get BUSY.  The wording of the dissenting opinion suggests an understanding of this.

Indiana Supreme Court Ruling <- – click and Read this please.

Justices Robert Rucker and Brent Dickson,  are to be credited for their dissent  (penned by Justice Rucker).

extra**  Judicial Precedent regarding right to defend against unlawful arrest.