NYT Tries and Fails to cover Justice Clarence Thomas

Clarence Thomas spoke at Stetson University in Florida on the recent Supreme Court decision overturning of regulations against free political speech.

His address is artlessly covered in the New York Times,  relying  upon what they know about leftists, and what they think about conservatives in determining  which comments to highlight.

Certainly Justice Thomas, being a legal genius,  has much to tell us  regarding  the constitutionality of limiting free speech,  but with NYT and other left wingers, it’s all about RACE.

Highlighted in the article is a mention of the dark side of regulating corporate speech with the Tillman act, which stifled Republican corporations  apparently  based upon their favoritism to Blacks.

Yes, the Republican party really was the civil rights party,  and, in liberal think, perhaps that ought to  bother conservatives.    However the real problem to conservatives is that  education had dumbed down the citizenry to an intellectually sheeplike status.    Most people don’t know that the Republican party fueled all of the civil rights legislation.  This  educational malpractice has  led to  self destructive attachment of many minorities to the Democrats, who contemptuously patronize them, while at the same time ‘aborting them for crime control’. (Are you having trouble believing that? No problem.   LISTEN to  Senator Dick Durbin explain to Senator Brownback, the need for federal funding for abortion in Washington DC.)

Small businesses and interest groups, who did not have sufficient  legal expertise and financial resources to form the entities which sidestep McCain Feingold, will once more be able to participate in the politcal processes.   In other words,  there is increased power to the grass roots,  and this is most fearsome to the political elites.

The voices  of small business entrepreneurs and their employees, will once more be heard in politics.   Grassroots prolife organizations can also enter the game, and we thank Justice Thomas and his  right-thinking peers.

.

Supremes Undo McCain Feingold Restrictions

In a five to four decision,  the Supreme Court opened up free political speech to everyone, once again giving special interest groups, and corporations, (and pro-lifers) equal footing with the media and unions.

This naturally has the side most favored by media and unions up in arms, wanting to hold congressional hearings to review the Supreme Court decision, and planning new legislation to put themselves back in the position of advantage.

It will be interesting to see how this opens up the political expression in churches, which was heretofore limited to Jeremiah Wright and the renegade Fr.  Michael Pfleger.  This has been suppressed since the Johnson administration, when the IRS took it upon itself to adopt a new regulatory condition for non-profits.

See the entire  court decision posted at Breitbart’s Big Journalism .
.