Category: first amendment

Ohio College Prohibits Student From Peacefully Distributing Anti-Birth Control Literature on Campus | The Blaze

~ Pharmer

Ohio College Prohibits Student From Peacefully Distributing Anti-Birth Control Literature on Campus | The Blaze.

Sinclair Community College  supposedly  has rules against students passing out literature on campus, if it is not pre-approved by the institution, and distributed by college recognized groups.

In other words…. toe the party line at Sinclair university.  If you would like a little more latitude in self expression at an educational institution, consider going elsewhere.

Judge Michael Brigner is the enforcer in this particular case, involving a student who was passing out brochures concerning the link of birth control to cancer, and abortion to breast cancer.

The faculty list of the Business and Public Service division of Sinclair is very very small  and does not include the head of the Paralegal subdivision, though he can be found on an awards and recognition page.

 

 

Pharmacy Owners Prevail in Court Decision on Blagojevich Edict

~ Pharmer

Illinois Pharmacy Owners have emerged victorious after six years of litigation against  the state of  Illinois edict compelling them to dispense the morning after pill.

This comes shortly after the approval of a new morning after pill, Ella, which is an analog of RU486, mifepristone.

Francis J Manion of the ACLJ, and Mark Rienzi, of Catholic University’s Columbus School of Law  teamed up as counsel to the pharmacy owners.

Deposed Governor Blagojevich’s original order addressing individual pharmacists had previously been overturned.

Judge Belz  noted that the government had made no effort to advance it’s supposed interest in supplying morning after pills to women prior to April 2010, and had specifically targeted pharmacists of conscience and their religious beliefs.

Pharmacists for Life International has stored the original letter from Blagojevich which threatened pharmacists  with loss of their license to practice if they did not dispense the morning after pill and all other  hormonal birth control products and contraceptives upon demand.

The coverage in the Chicago Tribune is very brief, does not mention the newest morning after pill, and does not mention that the original order to the pharmacists was for them to dispense all drugs labeled as “contraceptives” though most are misbranded.  It does mention an expected  (hoped for) appeal to the case.

 

Palin Haters Doing More of The Same

~ Pharmer

Inappropriate language warning for the video.

Here’s a nice sample of what we internet surfers commonly see from the Palin Haters. Some of it is event specific. No one in the media cries about hate speech unless it’s directed at a leftie, (or to deflect attention from one of their own when he acts out.) In fact some of the media has participated in similar speech to what is shown below.

Carolyn McCarthy Aims More Gun Control at You.

~ Pharmer ~ 1 Comment

Carolyn McCarthy readies gun control bill – Shira Toeplitz – POLITICO.com.

You knew this was coming: milking the Arizona assassination, held to be so much more significant than that of Major Nidal Malik  Hasan, because political figures were hit, instead of military personnel.

Leftist Carolyn McCarthy wants to make sure that  crazies and criminals retain access to guns, and you don’t.   That way they can kill large numbers of law-abiding citizens easier.

Another Dem, Robert Brady wants legislation to limit speech criticizing a political figure, since it might incite leftist  loons to commit murder.

Since the  “educators” were unable to adequately  deal with, and report an obviously crazy student at  Pima Community College, all of the rest of us will be expected to surrender more of our second amendment rights, and become  more defenseless, dependent, and easily subdued by the government.

Remember,  the other leftist, Hitler, who similarly stifled his opposition making more vigorous use of  pre-existing gun  laws, and a new one targeting Jews, to disarm the citizenry.

Extra update: the unarmed group which subdued Loughner. This one, related  by the woman who apparently  grabbed Loughner’s  clip, is probably the more realistic of the tales floating about.  The group of people credited in an  ABC story:   Patricia Maisch, Bill Badger, Roger Sulzgeber, Joseph Zimudie.  Maisch’s own story differs from audio news reports, and the sheriff’s  statement.  She stated that ‘two gentlemen’   had Loughney on the ground before she grabbed at his clip.

O’Donnell: Where is it in the Constitution?

~ Pharmer

Just do a Search, and find out that Google is not much help on factual news.

Christine O’Donnell debated Chris Coons in Delaware today, and her question about separation of church and state has been mocked by everyone who hasn’t read the U.S. Constitution and the First Amendment.

There is nothing about Separation of church and state in the constitution. The premise of her question is absolutely correct. Go look for yourself.
There is a prohibition against establishing a state church, or a theocracy. And there is protection of freedom of religion. But there is no separation. One does not separate the religion of a person from his activities, since the religion governs the activities.

The lefties are hell-bent to strip us of our free expression of religion, and the little students have been dutifully indoctrinated by their instructors. Widener University Law Students exposed their utter ignorance of the Constitution and the First Amendment, by their laughing response to O’Donnell’s question.

Read the First Amendment for yourself:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

No separation in there.

That idea came from a letter that Thomas Jefferson wrote, Danbury Baptist Association in 1802 and which the lefties have interpreted for the purpose of expunging the free expression of religion. Interestingly, the letter was an assurance that the churches would continue to be protected from encroachment by the government.

Regarding the presentation of Creationism in the public schools: nothing is wrong with presenting that as a theory concerning how we came to be. Evolution is a theory. Intelligent design is also a theory. Pharmer posits them as equivalent theories, because no one has observed either event occurring, and both are studied and pondered as possibilities by both scientists and theologians. Creationism is a subset idea under the Intelligent design concept, which comes from a rather literal interpretation of the Judeo-Christian religious texts. It does not violate the Constitution to present the various theories of how humans came to be. It is, however a violation of the Constitution to give only one theory as educational dogma, as is done by presenting only Evolution (a theory first brought forth by Charles Darwin, who also acknowledged the Creator in his book).

Those of us read Darwin’s book and who are functional in the field of science, understand that a Theory is not Dogma, and is not to be taught as such, or it will not be questioned, refined and improved.

O’Donnell’s religion is Catholicism. It does not propound a literal interpretation of the Biblical Creation Story as dogma. It does, however teach that there is the Creator who made the universe(s) and designed humans in His own image.

Pharmer, a functional scientist who does not fear freedom of religion, recommends this for a holistic public education curriculum:
The Evolution theory should be presented along with the Creation theories of many different cultures. Let’s have some diversity.

It’s very sad that the students at Widener University, and almost all of the mainstream media in the United States are so completely uneducated about our Constitution.

Pharmer of Indiana is donating to the Delaware campaign of O’Donnell, to honor the spirit of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as soon as they give a mechanism without requiring employer info. Found one!  Sent $ for both O’Donnell and  Angle.

There is a Dire need for the TEA Party and it must continue.

Anti Obama Billboard Removed After Leftie Terrorists Threaten Sign Owner

~ Pharmer

After violent threats at his business, and then more such calls to his wife from leftie terrorists,  a billboard sign owner removed an anti Obama ad which had displayed in Grand Junction Colorado.

The billboard showed Obama as characters of  issues which his administration has mishandled,  a terrorist, gangster, a mexican bandito, and a homosexual.

The identity of the person who actually created and ran the billboard ad is not given.

Historically leftists hold at least  four top world records for killing those who oppose their views.

Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Hitler………

Pastors Need Not Fear IRS

~ Pharmer

Another Wave of Pastors has sent their politically charged sermons to the IRS and have received no response.

David Barton, of the Wallbuilders believes, with good reason, that the IRS will not attempt to remove tax exempt status from these churches because they know they’ll lose in court.

By laying low, the IRS hopes to keep most pastors living in fear of them so as to allow only the more bold leftist pastors to exhort their congregations to political activism.

Wake Up America!!

Supremes Undo McCain Feingold Restrictions

~ Pharmer

In a five to four decision,  the Supreme Court opened up free political speech to everyone, once again giving special interest groups, and corporations, (and pro-lifers) equal footing with the media and unions.

This naturally has the side most favored by media and unions up in arms, wanting to hold congressional hearings to review the Supreme Court decision, and planning new legislation to put themselves back in the position of advantage.

It will be interesting to see how this opens up the political expression in churches, which was heretofore limited to Jeremiah Wright and the renegade Fr.  Michael Pfleger.  This has been suppressed since the Johnson administration, when the IRS took it upon itself to adopt a new regulatory condition for non-profits.

See the entire  court decision posted at Breitbart’s Big Journalism .
.