NYT and WAPO Find Planned Parenthood School Sex Ed Too Shocking for Their Readers

Both the New York Times and the Washington Post refused ads from the American Life League which contained images from Planned Parenthood’s sex ed for grade school kids.   The material in question is targeted for kids as young as 10 years old, yet the two leftie papers refused ads with the excuse that sample material was too shocking for their adult readers.

These two fading news rags are big Planned Parenthood supporters, yet they seem not to approve of the sex ed programs that the abortion giant is bringing into American primary schools.  The Washington post found the images too graphic.   The New York Times would only run the ads if the American Life League would blur the images which are used to teach our 10 year old kids.

Do you want to see the stuff which the WaPo and NYT think is too shocking for public viewing??  They are gross, but it might be good for you to know that your tax dollars are being used to show really graphic stuff to sexualize  your kids, and a teacher can get fired for refusing to cooperate.   Click here for a sample at HookingKids. 

ALL wants you to visit StopPlannedParenthood.com  for more info on how to protest the use of this garbage to pollute American children.

Infanticide is Here to Stay

Judge Jeffrey Minehart is dropping three of the murder charges, a charge of infanticide and  five counts of corpse abuse in the Kermit Gosnell case.

Count on abortion clinics adopting the practice of throwing live born babies immediately  into the freezer, rather than attempting supportive care.   This will prevent anyone from determining if the babies took their first breath before they died.

It does not matter that this information was published here.   The abortionists have surely been poring over the evidence and testimony in the Gosnell case  (which the media hides from the rest of the world).  They’ll know exactly how to dodge the Born Alive Infants Protection Acts.

People don’t want to know about this stuff, because they can’t deal with it.   There’s no change from the Germans who ignored their NAZIs, or Muslims ignoring their freakazoid bomber fanatics.

Infanticide is here to stay.

Getting to know Dzhokhar

Matthew Sheffield of Newsbusters has supplied  a collection of tweets coming from Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s account, celebrating the 2012 victory of Obama over Romney.    Accompanying this is a long list of links showing the leftist media trying to paint the two brothers, who are  blamed for the Boston Jihad, as conservatives.   Should people be supporting news outlets which are habitually wrong?

Watertown Police Chief, Edward Deveau has related  a story of how Dzhokhar’s older brother died :  Cops were in the process of handcuffing Tamerlan when Dzhokhar drove a stolen  SUV at them.  The police were able to dive out of the way, but Tamerlan was run over, and dragged by the  vehicle.

Update: Where did Dzokhar get money?    A few individuals have  claimed that they bought pot from him, so it appears  he got at least some of his income from selling drugs.  There is also mention of  work on the side, repairing cars.

Boston Jihad News is Faster on Drudge and Blaze

Here, there, and everywhere, we’ve been hearing lefties at CCN and various other outlets, naming conservatives as the cause of the Boston Marathon terror attack.  Perhaps they are crying in their Starbucks to find that a pair of Chechan converts to Islam are the apparent culprits.  Once more, they are wrong (lying)  about the right wing.  For the moment the left-media  can thank the bombers for shielding Kermit Gosnell’s infanticide trial from media scrutiny.  New legal proposals for the regulation of pressure cookers and licensure of those who use them are expected.

The eldest of the brothers  Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26,has already been killed.  His 19 year old brother, Dzhokhar, is being hunted and is currently pinned down by law enforcement in Watertown MA.

boston Jihad drudge 4-19-13

It’s always a surprise to the Pharmer  to meet a new conservative friend who hasn’t yet  moved to the Drudge Report as a primary news aggregator.   Drudge is always faster than the boob tube news with respect to election coverage and this current hunt for the second  of two suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing.  For people who aren’t satisfied with what Matt Drudge and his editors think are hot scoops,  there is a long list of international news portals, lamestream media,  and editorial links at the bottom of his page.

The Blaze is a more visual site, with a higher concentration of opinion, but it is still whupping the lamestream media in speed of Boston Jihad coverage.

Breitbart.com continues its quality output after the celestial discharge of their namesake, with Ben Shapiro and crew.  Available there is a timeline of the Tsarnaev brothers stay in the United states which sheds some light on possible motives for the bombing.

Get informed faster on the web, with your conservative  news aggregators and analysts.  Less fluff and more stuff.

A Sigh of Relief from NARAL for the Cover?

Bombs in Boston  Two at Marathon, One at JFK library.   So far,  Media claims 22 injured and two dead.

Four Dead and twenty one are injured in Chicago over the weekend.   Business as usual…..

Some national media journalists finally show  up at mass murderer Kermit Gosnell’s infanticide trial, after five weeks,   but Boston bombs will help them to hide this.    Check out the excuse from the Washington Post. 

 

Update: Do you think people will begin to notice that the media (CNN this time) is always wrong when they try to pin a bombing on right wing extremists?

CBS Journo-LOSTS Demonstrate Educational failure.

Officials: 80 Percent Of Recent NYC High School Graduates Cannot Read « CBS New York.

The article above  informs us that 80 percent of NYC High School Students need remedial instruction in the basics before going on to college.  In other words,  they have to pay for additional education because they’re not being adequately prepared by the government funded education.

Three hours before Pharmer encountered the article, another reader, “SS”,  had commented on a typo in the word ‘group’, (grouip), the mispelling of the word ‘nervous’, (nervus),  and the use of “emersion” rather than immersion.   Two of the errors were corrected, but the word “nervus” still remained at the time of this reading.

Were this a blogger, such as yours truly,  who posts news on the fly, without the benefit of an editor, one might expect some errors.  Journalists write for a living, and have the “benefit” of editors, who are supposed to review articles before publication.

Fortunately, CBS has a third layer of help from those who append comments to the posts.   Thanks “SS” for your voluntary service to news readers.

 

Celestial Discharge: Ms. Lorraine Bayless, Trailed by Media Mayhem.

Prayers for the peaceful repose of Ms. Lorraine Bayless, and prayers for her family, which, by all appearances, is being victimized by a bumbling news media and generally uninformed public.

Prior to her natural death, following a collapse in the dining hall of the Glenwood Gardens Extended Care Facility, the 87 year old Ms. Bayless was residing  in the independent living section of the facility.  Her condition precipitated a call to 911, by an  unnamed nurse.  The 911 dispatcher, in a much publicized call, begged the nurse to administer CPR.  When the nurse refused,  the dispatcher begged her to find someone else who would.

The daughter of Ms. Bayless, also a nurse,  has stated that she is satisfied with the care given to her mother at Glenwood Gardens.

What has precipitated the media storm,  foaming at the mouth, and gnashing of teeth by so many uninformed people, is a statement by KGET television of Bakersfield, California, that the elderly lady had not signed a DNR form.

Interestingly, over in the UK, the Daily Mail says just the opposite, that the women had indeed signed the DNR form.  Most who are commenting  at that  source are wondering what  is causing the big fuss in the U.S..   In their minds, the Glenwood nurse was fulfilling the lady’s wishes.

The two opposing claims are juxtaposed below.

NO DNR:

DNR KGET Lorraine Bayless

YES DNR:

DNR Daily Mail Lorraine Bayless

 

Your friendly Pharmer would like to add that not all elderly people want to be bagged and thumped when they are in the process of leaving this world.   Many truly do opt out of it, as they have accumulated too many health ailments, or fear doing so.  Some realize that the success rate of CPR is not all that terrific, and the outcome for an elderly person very seldom involves springing back to the prior state of health. CPR is also generally painful after the fact, due to cracked ribs, and many other possible injuries.

None of us know the circumstances of Ms. Bayless, nor do we know her final wishes, since reports are conflicting regarding her paperwork.   She need not have used a form to convey how she wished to go, and might have made her intentions known by other means.

Please avoid the temptation to ascribe this event to Obamacare (which is much worse than being allowed to die a natural death in old age).   Please also withhold judgment on the nurse who stayed with Ms. Bayless as the emergency care was summoned.  It would also be good to avoid  assumptions about the daughter of this lady, about whom we know little, other than that she does not intend to rain down legal punishments upon Glenwood Gardens extended care facility.

Having attended a good number of code blue events,  Pharmer quite understands the choice of people to opt out of CPR, and expects to make this choice for herself long before the age of 80.  Many health care professionals actually  feel guilty when they have to perform it on an elderly person who has not expressed their wishes on the matter.

 Update from newsok.com: City fire officials say Bayless did not have a “do not resuscitate” order on file at the home. Her family said, however, “it was our beloved mother and grandmother’s wish to die naturally and without any kind of life-prolonging intervention.””

Click here for a statement from the family of Lorraine Bayless, and please don’t hound them!  If the first link does not work, try THIS.

More on the Censorship Habit at the Whitehouse

Two years ago, the Obama administration was outed in San Francisco for threatening to exclude reporter Carla Marinucci and other Hearst journalists from future appearances, after she included a video of a protest outside an Obama April 2011 appearance in that city.  The editor at the San Francisco Chronicle, Phil Bronstein, reported on the threat the following day, which the White house officials then denied.

This prompted Chronicle editor Ward Bushee to call the officials out on their lie.  He revealed a day of correspondence between the editors and the White house, which finally resulted in the rescission of the ban.

A portion of the behavior of the media is based on a fear of losing access if they do not faithfully serve the interests of the administration.  The net effect is that Americans have news which is not news, but is merely government feed.

Archives:  From the San Francisco Chronicle: Obamastyle “transparency”

Journalists Report Threats from the White House for Articles Critical of Obama

Bob Woodward reports that he has angered the Obama administration so significantly that he has been threatened by a “very senior person” at Whitehouse.   They did not appreciate Woodward reminding us that Obama originated the sequestration and signed the bill which contained it, on August 2 of 2011, and then threatened veto of any bill which rescinded any part of it.

Woodward also has objected to Obama’s changes in military maneuvers, and blaming the sequestration for these changes.

From Business Insider:  “Earlier today on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Woodward ripped into Obama in what has become an ongoing feud between the veteran Washington Post journalist and the White House. Woodward said Obama was showing a “kind of madness I haven’t seen in a long time” for a decision not to deploy an aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf because of budget concerns.”

Lanny Davis, who served as advisor to former President Clinton reports that he received similar threats from the Obama administration for columns that he wrote in the Washington Times.   In an interview with WMAL radio, Davis said that his editor, John Solomon got a call from a white house official who said “that if he continued to run my columns, he would lose, or his reporters would lose their White House credentials.”

Bob Woodward: Obama is Lying About the Sequester

Bob Woodward, leftie journalist of the Washington Post, in a “random act of Journalism”, has revealed the detailsabout the origin of the ‘sequester‘, which Obama is currently blaming on the Republicans.

Jack Lew and Obama cooked up the ‘sequester‘.  It’s automatically triggered reduction in projected spending, which was to prevent Obama from having to negotiate the issue during the campaign.

Says Woodward: “The president and Lew had this wrong. My extensive reporting for my book “The Price of Politics” shows that the automatic spending cuts were initiated by the White House and were the brainchild of Lew and White House congressional relations chief Rob Nabors — probably the foremost experts on budget issues in the senior ranks of the federal government.Obama personally approved of the plan for Lew and Nabors to propose the sequester to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). They did so at 2:30 p.m. July 27, 2011, according to interviews with two senior White House aides who were directly involved.”

Do click on the paragraph above.    You will find out that  Bob Woodward is still a good leftie reporter, working for the Washington Post.  Hecouldn’t dance to the media tune, because Obama’s lie contradicted what he had already written in his own book.
Woodward still thinks that Obama is right to insist on more taxes and, most particularly taxing the rich, but he’s not going along with the lie that the Republicans invented the ‘sequester’.

By the way, the sequester is puny, not enough reduction in spending, and will not cause the projected disasters because very little money is involved, as a percentage of total spending. Since the sequester is Obama’s idea, it does contain disproportionate reductions in projected military expenditures, when compared to government dependency programs.