Category: tea party

Wis. Gov. Walker calls Democrat boycott a ‘stunt’ – Yahoo! News

~ Pharmer

Wis. Gov. Walker calls Democrat boycott a ‘stunt’ – Yahoo! News.

The story behind the story is that teachers took their students out of class for this event to support teachers unions, and many of the students had no clue why they were there. Meanwhile, Democrat legislators left the state in order to delay voting on the bill.

Since we can no longer have people who make less than union workers, supporting the retirement plans for union workers, in addition to their social security,  there will need to be reform. This will happen without the democrats who were bought and paid for by unions.

The Union retirement plans are going bankrupt.   The working people of America cannot afford to support plush early retirements.

Watch the Tea Party driving legislators back into Wisconsin.

Related stories of Union mismanagement:

https://themorningafter.us/obamas-seiu-goons-drop-health-coverage-for-kids-of-low-income-members-in-new-york/

http://washingtonexaminer.com/special-reports/2009/06/union-officer-pension-funds-remain-flush-rank-and-file-retirement-plans-dete

http://pensionpulse.blogspot.com/2010/05/bailing-out-union-pension-funds.html

Teaparty moves to recall Tucson sheriff Clarence Dupnik.

~ Pharmer

Outspoken Tucson sheriff faces recall bid – Washington Times.

Teapartiers have initiated a bid to recall the mouthy leftie, Sheriff Clarence Dupnik,  and will hold a rally to kick off their signature drive.  They need to collect over 90,000 signatures (almost a fifth of the registered voters) in order to hold a special election to replace him.

It’s an uphill battle, but perhaps enough Tucsonians have tired of being flagellated verbally for the crimes of Jared Loughner.

Stewart Rally vs Beck Rally to scale.

~ Pharmer ~ 13 Comments

Found at Gateway Pundit, posted by keypro at American Spectator.  These side by side photos of the Beck Rally and Stewart rally, with a scale map at the bottom, can overcome any garbage you might hear about their relative sizes from the media. Click on the photo to see the large version.

Update 10-31 5:34 pm….   a little note that filming at ground zero of the rally was  to be strictly prohibited without a media pass, according to the email exchange between the planners and PJTV.

O’Donnell: Where is it in the Constitution?

~ Pharmer

Just do a Search, and find out that Google is not much help on factual news.

Christine O’Donnell debated Chris Coons in Delaware today, and her question about separation of church and state has been mocked by everyone who hasn’t read the U.S. Constitution and the First Amendment.

There is nothing about Separation of church and state in the constitution. The premise of her question is absolutely correct. Go look for yourself.
There is a prohibition against establishing a state church, or a theocracy. And there is protection of freedom of religion. But there is no separation. One does not separate the religion of a person from his activities, since the religion governs the activities.

The lefties are hell-bent to strip us of our free expression of religion, and the little students have been dutifully indoctrinated by their instructors. Widener University Law Students exposed their utter ignorance of the Constitution and the First Amendment, by their laughing response to O’Donnell’s question.

Read the First Amendment for yourself:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

No separation in there.

That idea came from a letter that Thomas Jefferson wrote, Danbury Baptist Association in 1802 and which the lefties have interpreted for the purpose of expunging the free expression of religion. Interestingly, the letter was an assurance that the churches would continue to be protected from encroachment by the government.

Regarding the presentation of Creationism in the public schools: nothing is wrong with presenting that as a theory concerning how we came to be. Evolution is a theory. Intelligent design is also a theory. Pharmer posits them as equivalent theories, because no one has observed either event occurring, and both are studied and pondered as possibilities by both scientists and theologians. Creationism is a subset idea under the Intelligent design concept, which comes from a rather literal interpretation of the Judeo-Christian religious texts. It does not violate the Constitution to present the various theories of how humans came to be. It is, however a violation of the Constitution to give only one theory as educational dogma, as is done by presenting only Evolution (a theory first brought forth by Charles Darwin, who also acknowledged the Creator in his book).

Those of us read Darwin’s book and who are functional in the field of science, understand that a Theory is not Dogma, and is not to be taught as such, or it will not be questioned, refined and improved.

O’Donnell’s religion is Catholicism. It does not propound a literal interpretation of the Biblical Creation Story as dogma. It does, however teach that there is the Creator who made the universe(s) and designed humans in His own image.

Pharmer, a functional scientist who does not fear freedom of religion, recommends this for a holistic public education curriculum:
The Evolution theory should be presented along with the Creation theories of many different cultures. Let’s have some diversity.

It’s very sad that the students at Widener University, and almost all of the mainstream media in the United States are so completely uneducated about our Constitution.

Pharmer of Indiana is donating to the Delaware campaign of O’Donnell, to honor the spirit of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as soon as they give a mechanism without requiring employer info. Found one!  Sent $ for both O’Donnell and  Angle.

There is a Dire need for the TEA Party and it must continue.

Why The Catholic Bishops Don’t Get Donations From Pharmer

~ Pharmer

Pharmer continues the boycott of the US Catholic Bishops fundraisers, and here’s just one more reason.

This appeared in Pharmer’s Church bulletin during October, Pro-life month:

“The Indiana Bishops have asked that parishes and affiliated/associated organizations NOT distribute or allow distribution of Indiana Right To Life’s or county affiliate organization’s election materials.
The Indiana Right to Life has adopted a clearly partisan policy that effectively endorses ONLY Republican candidates for elected offices.
When the Indiana Right to Life Policy and materials are again non-partisan, with a focus on education and advocacy, parishes may be able to cooperate with the local and state organization during the election campaign once more.”

The use of the word “republican” in this announcement violates it’s own supposed non-partisan message. Thus it is internally inconsistent with the supposed spirit the Indiana Bishops are pretending to convey.

The reality is that the bulk of U.S. Bishops (outside of a persistently pro life minority) are paying lip service to pro-life ideals only due to the prodding of the pro-life Pope Benedict.

The Wallbuilders have established three years running that the churches need not fear the IRS removal of tax exempt status. Those preachers doing political advocacy from the pulpits, and sending the tapes to the IRS have yet to be taken to task. The IRS knows that it will lose this case in court, so it keeps silent, allowing the IRS intimidation of most pastors to proceed.

The Catholic Church in the United States ought not to specifically ally itself with any party, but it really needs to get out of bed with the pro-abortion, pro-infanticide, pro-euthanasia, pro-gay marriage, Pro-WAR, pro-slavery, anti-civil rights, Democrat party of the KKK. Those of us who know the history of the U.S. Wars and the above mentioned misbehaviors know which party has initiated and/or supported them in our government.

Any politically conscious person knows that the Republican party is not without stain, and this is why there is a TEA-party for one example. Pharmer has been boycotting the RNC appeals for many years, and assisting individual candidates in other ways.

Pro-life politicians need to find another party, because the Democrat party at the national level has been impervious to transformation on these issues, and defunds its pro-life candidates at the national level. Democrats have moved further left with their chosen president’s inclusion of actual infanticide as an extension of abortion.

Notes:

The Indiana Right to Life Voter Guide has no endorsements included on the document. It has survey questions for federal and state candidates, followed by lists of the candidates (without party affiliation) and their replies to the questions.

Indiana Right to Life has issued a statement that it will back no Democrats this year, due in part  to the cooperation of Indiana Democrats with the pro abortion Obamacare.  The Democrat state officials have not allowed pro-life legislation to proceed in the Indiana legislature as well.  The Indiana Bishops are reminded of Independents, Teapartiers, and Libertarians which are active within the state, and which are not excluded from consideration.  It is revealed that the “only republicans” statement appearing in the church bulletin really means “no democrats”.

The 2010 List of Indiana Right to Life PAC endorsements- click HERE

The Democrat Party Platform of 2008 on Abortion:
“The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v Wade and a woman’s right to choose a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay, and we oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.”

“The Democratic Party also strongly supports access to comprehensive affordable family planning services and age-appropriate sex education which empower people to make informed choices and live healthy lives. We also recognize that such health care and education help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the need for abortions.”

“The Democratic Party also strongly supports a woman’s decision to have a child by ensuring access to and availability of programs for pre and post natal health care, parenting skills, income support, and caring adoption programs.”

Who Would You Rather Have Living In Your Neighborhood?

~ Pharmer

August 28 vs Oct 2, the aftermath in Washington DC at the exit of a huge crowd of teapartiers and supporters of the military, compared to that at the exit of the “One Nation” democrat socialists.

Who would you want living next to you, a nice teapartier, or one of these environmentally conscious Democrats?
Need a little more convincing?
OK, here you are.

After the Obama Inauguration: SHOVEL-READY!

After the 9-12 teaparty:

Head on over to NewsBusters to check out the overhead crowd shots of the Glen Beck Rally Vs the One Nation of socialists Rally.
That’ll give you some serious perspective when comparing the aftermath shots.

Hope for Australia: Their Own Tea Party

~ Pharmer

Tea Party comes to Australia | The Australian.

David Goodridge, a member of the movement (the website editor) states that the Australian Tea Party will not be an additional political party, but will influence those that already exist.

Their special words for their new PM’s administration:  “Gillard’s Labor Government: a unique form of Mussolini’s Corporatist model set to an Australian context”.

Check out the Australian Tea Party Here.

Tea Partiers to Transfer Funds

~ Pharmer

Christine O’Donnell, Delaware winner, bashes ‘cannibalism’ – Mike Allen – POLITICO.com.

Since it appears that the Republican party is refusing to  stand behind the candidate who won their Delaware  Primary,  more of the real conservatives will have to allocate their political funding towards individual candidates, and NOT THE RNC.

Conservatism will have to be grass roots for a good while longer, it seems.

Spend your Money Here if you would like to support O’Donnell for U.S. Senate. If she wins in November, she takes her seat immediately, (because this is an election replacing Biden’s seat).

If She Wins, there is potential for the Republicans to stop some of the lame duck activities of the Senate before January.

If O’Donnell Wins….. the old guard republican party will begin to understand a need to listen to the people, and the Democrats will Freak Out.

If you donate to O’Donnell, be sure to write to Sen. John Cornyn to tell him what you did with your money.   He needs more encouragement to understand that a political party  is supposed to be supporting its candidates enthusiastically.