Problems for the Republican National Commitee?

Maybe the RNC should read this. One leftie theory is that Pharmer is not the only one who left the republican party in 2012. If things were anywhere near the way they had gone in the past, a double digit lead among independents, with the first digit being usually a 2, would have made Romney the winner. Understand that the leftie media does not want to recognize that the tea party exists, so they will continue to use the term “independents” to describe them.

“State polls showed Romney winning big among independents. Historically, any candidate polling that well among independents wins. But as it turned out, many of those independents were former Republicans who now self-identify as independents. The state polls weren’t oversampling Democrats and undersampling Republicans – there just weren’t as many Republicans this time because they were calling themselves independents.”

via Adviser: Romney
"shellshocked" by loss – CBS News
.

As is apparent, Romney fell shy of McCain’s vote number by about 3 million, and Obama missed his 2008 mark by 10 million.
Who stayed home? Pharmer will watch for the number crunchers to churn out their results and guesses. She’s already aware that some were so angry at the republicans for choosing another moderate that they refused to participate in the presidential election.
The storms probably bit into Obama’s numbers since they affected blue states, which are ill prepared for such eventualities. This of course would not affect their electoral outcome.

Wild Bill is calling the Church People and Tea Partiers to action. Pharmer likes his utterly blunt style.

Art Robinson, opposing DeFazio in Oregon, trashes Rachel Maddow in this Interview.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Rachel Madcow  certainly shows signs of mental decline.   A statement from Congressional candidate, Dr. Robinson  that OTHER conditions were being reclassified as AIDS, ( in order to politically justify funding),   was morphed by this whacked out woman into a statement that HIV itself  was a government conspiracy. Those two ideas are definitely NOT the same thing. Far from it.

Pharmer thanks Breitbart, who hosted this, for reminding her why she doesn’t have cable, and would never pay to have MS-LSD displayed on the flat screen.

Yes, Pharmer was a researcher  working at one of the locations of the multicenter trial for the first HIV drug, back when it was called AZT.  Yes, the grant that paid her salary was part of the  largesse allocated  to studying HIV and the conditions which accompany it.

It was fashionable to tie any research on diseases affecting immunosupressed people to HIV in order to get grant $$$$.
Art Robinson’s actual statement from that time does make sense, understood within the politically infused environment of research.  

He did a good job with Rachel Madcow.