Calgary U Students Face Expulsion for Pro-Life Display

Calgary U Students Face Expulsion for Pro-Life Display.

That graphic Genocide Awareness Project  display is just too much for Calgary University to take.

What had  not been seen as  too much to take in Calgary — is infanticide.  Here’s a blast from the past: an old Alberta Report article about the goings on at Calgary’s  Foothills Hospital.

Back to the present,  it appears that the pro-life  students who are hosting the GAP display at Calgary University might be expelled for their efforts, but appear to be willing to take that chance.   It might be up to the university to decide if the effort to suppress the students will be worth all  that  negative publicity which prolifers will give them, free of charge.

Fun with Stupak, or Pick Your Own “Pro-life” Turncoat Congressman

Get your video cameras ready for some theatrics.

Purchase 30 pieces of silver (rounds or coins)   from your favorite metals dealer.   Do it as an individual or group.  Donate it to a Crisis Pregnancy Center or other,  willing, pro-life, charitable beneficiary,  to use as a hedge against inflation.  They can sell off when they need to,  and use it for operating expenses.  It’s a nice gift which can be given in the name of the one you’d like to irritate.

Send a photo of the silver, a receipt and a bill to your favorite turncoat, bogus ‘ pro-life’ politician.

Upload a video record of the fun to the internet and send a copy to your political pal with that receipt.

(Checking with a dealer today, Silver rounds were at $16.97.  Purchasing price  would be $17.97 apiece.  The market value changes  a good deal from day to day.)

A Leftie is Complaining that Bart Stupak Would Not Consult the Nuns.

Dropped this at Legal Sleaze because Jodi Jacobson is bumming-out  that Bart Stupak won’t consult with the pro-choice nuns.

Let’s remember Who is attacking Bart Stupak.    The leftist side.

It was interesting to hear a Democrat say he doesn’t go to the nuns  for info on drafting pro-life legislation.
This is actually because the most vocal and   politicized among them are not pro-life.  The media does not interview pro-life nuns.

I would not go to most of  the Americans who claim to be Catholic for pro-life information and political assistance.
This is because many of them are democrats who naively believe that health care can be handed over to a corrupt institution  (the U.S. government)  and expected to improve.  Also, many are not pro-life.

Stupak, ever a democrat,  believes that the health care debacle can be sold by removing language allowing government funding of abortion.  This is a joke.
With  existing socialized systems,  abortion has been mandated by the lack of health coverage and treatment for those with untoward fetal diagnoses.   The mother is told that she should abort the baby with congenital defects.   Also, women who are raped, or who receive risky medications are told that they SHOULD abort.  Many would prefer not to.

If abortion funding is removed from Obamacare,  by necessity of cost cutting, there will remain the unfunded mandate of abortion.

The current leftist ideology and template for girls and women is that they should be available for sex at a young age, and  have abortions early and often, thereby functioning as  good and convenient sexual utilities.   Yes, the functioning is expected to be similar to that of electrical wall sockets.   Most American  leftists actually  hate the life-bearing aspect of women.  (Years of  testing and observation  back this contention.) These same people  also hate traditional Catholic teaching which has assigned the highest rank and honor  among humans to Mary, the Mother of Jesus.

The ‘brave new world’ for women under leftist care will be little better than life under the Taliban.

*** addendum :  Stupak can add   this group of sisters to his phone list.   Here’s their full web site.

The Mainstream Media Finally Noticed The Disproportionately High Abortion Rate Among Black Women

Their first coverage of what Black Pro-lifers placed before them for Years, is an attempt to claim that Blacks are being used by the Pro-life movement to push our horrible agenda against killing.

Tanya M Acker blogs at CNN  that Black women don’t need help from the pro-lifers who have reported  for decades  that American Blacks are aborting at a vastly higher rate than Whites.  It’s worth giving her commentary a read, before proceeding to  the reply Pharmer  offered on that site, and below:

Both breast cancer and fetal mortality ( loss of subsequent children due to prematurity) are linked to abortion.
This might help to explain the higher incidence this author cites among Blacks.

Almost half of Black children are aborted and Alan Guttmacher Institute has recently reported that the rate of abortion among Blacks is approaching 5 times that of Whites in the U.S.

Among sexually active teens, contraceptive failure is quite high, due to notoriously imperfect compliance. and pregnancy is a  usual result within a few years.   The incidence of unplanned pregnancy and abortion in the college years are  also astronomically high. Truly, most of planned parenthood’s services become abortion related. Abby Johnson, former director of a planned parenthood clinic, informs us that this is by design. There is pressure from above to drum up more of the profitable abortion business.

The author appears to concur with Margaret Sanger that abortion is “needed” by the lower income and the minority women, hence there is approval of the location of clinics primarily in urban areas.

The assumption that abortion is most often a “freely made choice” for a woman suggests a disconnect with reality. Do women choose to be under the pressure of bad social and economic circumstances such that they feel a need to kill their unborn child?
Where are these women who have FREELY CHOSEN to kill their own offspring prior to, during, or shortly after birth?

Among abortion supporters there’s a vacillation between presenting abortion as a sad thing that some women feel they have to do, and the above suggestion that it’s just a freely taken option, (a walk in the park, no big deal).

There’s also the suggestion that Black pro-lifers who brought up this disparity decades ago, to be ignored by all except the pro-life news media, are being paternalistic. Or even the recognition from the rest of pro lifers that something is wrong with this, is considered paternalistic. In the same article is the suggestion that Blacks NEED to be CARED FOR in so many other ways, by the government, but attention to this abortion disparity, and the health problems it brings, should be ignored.

Who is being paternalistic? What good have governments done for any of the peoples, around the world, whom they have taken under the wing and to whom they have provided “care” ?

Prolife Picketers at Churches

There’s a discussion  at Jill Stanek’s Blog about prolife protesters who picket at churches, in order to  awaken a response to the abortion holocaust.

There has been a  vast body of writing  at online prolife  forums from  another most colorful   church picketer.    He is now deceased, but should not be forgotten.   The Pharm  search  division connects the dots and brings you  this 2002 article about Robert Ferguson.

Los Angeles Lay Catholic Mission | June 2002 | It’s a Lighthouse When We’re Standing Out There, by Christopher Zehnder.

A Public Relations Problem for Kaiser Permanente

News from Wilmington, CA:

That well known HMO, casting its shadow over the Western US, (and foretelling what is to come with socialized medicine), has brought itself another public relations problem.

It seems managers at Kaiser Permanente indelicately handled the dismissal of two employees
, and an over-reaction to this lead to the murder of five children followed by suicide of the parents. Indications suggest that both parents were cooperating in this plan.

While it’s not appropriate to blame good ol’ Kaiser for this tragic event, and the terrible decision of the parents, a perusal of the initial story will indicate that the company deserves the negative public relations fallout, due to their poor interactions with the dismissed employees.

For example, when firing an employee, it is best not to suggest that he should have blown his brains out, even in an indirect manner. The employee might take the suggestion literally. This might cause negative repercussions, as in the current case of the Lupoe family.

My prediction from going over the news stories is that Kaiser Permanente is going to face some questions regarding adherence to HIPAA regulations.

This is sad, sad stuff.

Mom who killed baby girl is allowed partial custody of the twin brother.

Yes, Canada’s demented child welfare and justice system allows this woman to be with this defenseless infant three days per week, AFTER she KILLED his SISTER. The U.S. system really is not reliably different.

If you are normal, this will cause nausea: The “mom” delivered a little girl, cut the cord, stuffed her into a plastic bag and left the baby to die in the trunk of her car. She then went to the hospital three days later with abdominal pain and delivered the girl’s twin brother there. The docs discovered a second cord connection on the placenta. This induced a search for the missing sibling which revealed the dead baby girl curled in a bag in the trunk of “mom’s” car.

Another blogger is noting that selective reduction of siblings in the womb (killing one or more of multiple human fetuses) is fine, according to the law.
Perhaps the court sees this fact and finds that it’s OK for the little baby boy to be left with the mother who murdered his sister.

Fortunately this blogger and the reporter who submitted the story are sufficiently shocked for me to know that some normal people remain in Canada.

Baby screened for breast cancer gene is born.

What this title really means is that any of this couple’s offspring who carried a gene, which is strongly associated with cancer in the father’s family, have been killed in order to eradicate the genetic characteristic from the family’s descendants. A baby without the gene was allowed to live until birth.

This is another example of curing disease by killing those humans which are potentially afflicted, while they are very young, perhaps at the embryonic or fetal stage.

Read an article which attempts to put a big happy face on this policy which required the demise of the Hippocratic Oath.

I wonder if this family understands the infectious origin of many cancers. They’ve only prevented one type.