As many pro-lifers know, Jill Stanek has joined with Life Dynamics to report news on the life issues. She’s now reporting on a groundbreaking push by Life Dynamics to hold the abortion industry accountable for concealing the sexual abuse of minors.
This blog has repeatedly referred to the first study, done more than 10 years ago by Life Dynamics,which revealed that over 90 percent of abortion clinics, who were called by an actress portraying a 13 year old girl with 22 year old boyfriend, showed a willingness to flout the laws requiring reporting of suspected sexual abuse of minors. Many of these abortion clinics even provided the methodology to conceal the sexual abuse.
Now Life Dynamics has mailed CDs to 53 thousand personal injury attorneys to educate them on the state laws pertinent to this issue, and the possibility of bringing suit against school officials, health care professionals and clinics which provide services to minors who have been sexually abused by adults, and fail in their legal requirement to report such abuse to the state.
Jill Stanek reports that Mark Crutcher’s phone at Life Dynamics has been ringing incessantly ever since launching this campaign.
Your friendly Pharmer suggests that further rich ground for the lawyers exists and that fear of litigation can dissuade retail pharmacies from stocking Plan B and Ella.
The government can force retailers to sell these drugs to the sexual predators, only if they stock the drug.
In the future, lawsuits might be the tool to stop the government from forcing retailers to stock these drugs. None of the businesses could survive a group of civil lawsuits for aiding sexual predators.
Currently good target states for this kind of litigation are Washington, Oregon and of course, New York. The large retail pharmacy chains would run screaming to the State Boards of Pharmacy for relief from the governments requirement to sell these drugs to minor females and their rapists.
Please pass this information, as well as the other three films and the Kermit Gosnell news on to your friend and associates. Help us make up for the fact that the media no longer transmits the news. Social media links are below each post.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has granted an injunction which excuses the businesses owned by Frank and Phil Gilardi, of Ohio, from compliance with the Obamacare HHS mandate. The Gilardi’s own food distribution businesses, and operate them in accordance with their Catholic beliefs. Their health insurance does not cover contraception and abortion. After a final emergency appeal from the ACLJ, the Court of Appeals, changed their position on March 29th, allowing the Gilardis to continue to freely practice their religion in their business operations, while their lawsuit opposing the HHS mandate proceeds through the courts. This is the fifth injunctionobtained by the American Center for Law and Justice against the HHS Mandate of Obamacare.
Is this for real? The story is that a female student complained to administrators that she felt a threat to her life due to the awesome sound of this phone app. Dan says the sound quality is pretty wimpy. Pharmer has the i-Gun app, and yes……… the sound from small phone speakers does not, in any way, convey the true sound of gunfire.
UMA Spokesperson, Linda Weldon, has assured everyone that UMA will not be commenting on this incident, which is good, because nothing is going to help the reputation of this school, which advertises itself as military friendly, after the word gets out.
Enquiring minds want to know that if a student is traumatized by the sound of a phone gun app, what good will she be as a nurse? How will she handle dementia patients, violent patients, or sex offenders in the various clinical settings?? Is she the preferred quality of student for UMA to send into the Obamacare environment??
Dan has obtained some G.I. Bill tuition assistance as a veterans’ benefit. Do avail yourself of the Shnitt link to see that he is NOT likely a waste of money. Would this suspension mean that UMA is burning your tax dollars??? A possible side story is that Dan might be experiencing backlash for objecting to fellow students cheating, and copying teachers’ test materials. Perhaps the Veterans administration would like to investigate UMA’s accreditation and use of G.I. Bill funds.
From the Quebec “Dying with Dignity” Euthanasia Commission comes the following recommendation for providing physician assisted death.
By definition, medical aid in dying could only be provided by a physician. Under their codes of ethics, physicians and nurses are entitled to conscientious objection, meaning they can refuse to perform an act that goes against their values. Of course, physicians and nurses will retain this right where medical aid in dying is concerned. However, a doctor who refuses to provide medical aid in dying for reasons of conscience will have the duty to help his patient find another who is prepared to do so, as quickly as possible
Personal ethics notwithstanding, every physician will have to refer for killing, as a requisite function of medical practice in Quebec, if the above recommendation goes through. Canada has little to no conscience protection for health care professionals who think that killing is wrong.
There is 100% chance that the same will be expected of all U.S. physicians once Obamacare matures into its utopian form.
Most states already require pharmacists to refer patients to receive abortive drugs, if they choose not to dispense them. Physicians are expected to make the option of abortion known to a woman if her baby has an unfavorable prenatal diagnosis. They fear legal liability if they do not.
These are the reasons that those who think that killing humans is wrong will need to avoid working in many of the health care professions in the near future.
You won’t hear hardly a whisper of this if you watch the mainstream news. Sen Bob Menendez apparently likes to visit the Dominican Republic, via private aircraft for recreational reasons. He has a Democrat, donor buddy, Dr. Salomon Melgen, an opthalmologist with whom he likes to party, and the FBI knows it. This is why they have raided said physician’s office complex looking for evidence, and have driven away with van’s full of material.
Some other problems of Dr. Melgen, besides his party life with Sen Menendez, are his successive tax liens, amounting to many millions of dollars.
For background, you can visit HERE, and see the original interviews of women in the Dominican Republic, who say that Sen. Menendez paid them for sex. The women reported that he promised them $500, but they only received $100.
Emails pertaining to the FBI investigation have been published HERE. On the sidebar, at that link, is a flash widget for downloading the dossier of the federal investigation, containing many email screenshots and other information.
Two Texas women, Angel Dobbs, 38, and her niece Ashley Dobbs, 24 are suing the TX State Troopers for unlawfully searching their body cavities along the side of the highway, this past July.
The dash cam of the cop car recorded it for all the world to see. You can determine that the search actually occurred if you desire to follow the link at the top.
A detail mentioned in the story is that the same latex gloves were used by officer Kelley Helleson to search both women vaginally and anally. The women were initially pulled over by officer David Farrell for throwing cigarette butts out the window.
It’s like that with the TSA also. If you have a concern to avoid sexually transmitted infections, you might wish to consider this when flying, and now, when taking a road trip through Texas.
Influencing this decision is a court determination that the Internal Revenue Service needs to establish which officials have sufficient rank for setting and enforcing the policies. Another unspoken problem is the glaring partisanship of the supposed ‘non-profit’, Planned Unparenthood. The IRS would obviously have to remove tax exempt status from the abortion giant if it were to remove that of any churches. Uneven enforcement of regulations does not hold up well from a legal standpoint.
For now, it is open season FOR politics from the pulpit.
Pastors and preachers may freely tell their congregations that Obama is more pro-abortion than 99 percent of abortionists. An exception is Kermit Gosnell, whose trial for infanticides starts in March.
Elisa Bauer, of Washoe County in Nevada, suffers multiple disabilities from fetal alcohol syndrome. As an adult she lives in a group home, but remains under the guardianship of her adoptive family. She’s pregnant, and Washoe County social services has requested a court hearing which could override the decision of Elisa and her family to have her baby. The family has six potential adoptive families already lined up, and they are providing prenatal care for Elisa, whose pregnancy is considered high risk.
It appears that Social Services and the Court might prefer that Elisa abort, and may force this issue. In order to proceed, Washoe County would have to petition for guardianship, so that they could force her to abort.
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley and and Sons is a case before the Supreme Court this fall which threatens aspects of the 1908 First Sale Doctrine. That older ruling allows people who own a copyrighted item to resell the item without getting permission from the copyright holder. This new case before the court, depending on how broadly the Court writes the ruling, could require resellers of copyrighted items made in Europe, or Asia to get permission from the copyright holders before they sell such products. It could affect resale of numerous products and items which bear copyrighted programming, content and logos.
This case is touched off by the fact that books published outside the country, by American publishers, for use in other countries, are being purchased and brought back into the U.S. for resale.
The publishers, for example, of Pharmer’s son’s anatomy and biochemistry texts, have a version in the U.S., priced more than double that of the version they sell in other countries. Obviously students, who are being bilked unconscionably for tuition costs, are trying to save hundreds of dollars each semester on their book bills, and buying versions published in Southeast Asia or India, etc.
A Court decision against the right of first sale in this case could have far reaching implications:
1) It could impede the ability of individuals to recycle textbooks, and electronic devices, or buy international versions for cheaper prices.
2) It will encourage manufacturers and publishers to produce shoddier merchandise and/or increase planned obsolescence in order to push new items to a consumer less inclined to buy new if they can’t sell the old one.
3) Most significantly, it will exacerbate the problem of often toxic waste and mountainous landfills.
The greenies ought to be camped outside the Supreme Court building throughout the fall over this.
Remember his decision to remove citizen’s right to resist unlawful entry of law enforcement officers into our homes.
Here’s the background you need to evaluate Pharmer’s advice. Click those links!
Indiana Judicial Elections, 2012 Note that Justice Robert Rucker, who dissented against the decision written by Justice Steven David, is also up for reappointment. With respect to this particular constitutional issue, Rucker survives the flush test.
The Indiana legislative bodies and Governor Mitch Daniels (who appointed Justice David) passed another law to negate that horrible Supreme Court decision.
THe General Accounting Office has announced that Obama’s welfare waivers, which end the work requirement set up during the Clinton administration, are illegal.
This news will be hidden from the public which hasn’t figured out that the BOOB TUBE and the other mainstream media are not the places to get information.
Congress was supposed to be involved in any changes in the welfare requirements. It’s Budgetary!
Sherley vs. Sebelius (the Abortifacient One) is the latest in the massive list of Stupid Court Tricks.
The DC Circuit Court has ruled relative to a test of the Dickey Wicker amendment, that embryonic stem cell research can be federally funded (with your tax dollars) if the perpetrators can remember to kill the embryos before they get the money.
DUH!
This is how the court interprets a legal directive which forbids federal funding of destructive embryonic stem cell research.
Of no consequence to the court are the facts that the embryos are still being killed for the research and that the this avenue of research has yielded zero medical treatments.
The Justice Department has just dropped a criminal human trafficking case against Global Horizons which involved accusations of exploiting 600 farm workers. Eight executives and associates, including CEO Mordechai Orian were charged.
Workers are said to have been lured to the U.S. from Thailand, with the promise of high wages, but instead detained in over crowded, poor housing with inadequate food. In some cases they were kept on the premises by guards.
After spending millions of dollars on the case, the Justice Department is dropping it on the basis that they feel there is inadequate evidence to prove guilt beyond the shadow of a doubt. Three of the eight defendants in the case pled guilty but will have an opportunity to retract their pleas.
The dismissal order states: “Based on this further investigation, the government has determined that dismissal of this matter is in the interest of justice.”
Last year, Federal prosecuters dropped a similar case against Aloun Farms in Hawaii after the lead prosecutor misstated the law while presenting to a grand jury. OOPS!
Savannah Dietrich felt that the group of guys who molested her when she was passed out at a party got off too easy. Judge Dee McDonald,who made the decision, in juvenile court, placed a broad gag order that barred Dietrich from speaking about what happened to her at the party. The case involves two males under the age of 18, who assaulted Dietrich while she was passed out, and shared pictures of the event with others.
In her frustration over the light sentence for her attackers, Dietrich revealed their names on Twitter.
“They said I can’t talk about it or I’ll be locked up,” Dietrich tweeted. “So I’m waiting for them to read this and lock me up. ____ justice.
“Protect rapist is more important than getting justice for the victim in Louisville.”
Dietrich might now face fines and up to six months in jail, for contempt of court. While a decision is being made in her case, the lawyers of the perpetrators, , Chris Klein and David Mejia, have asked for a continuance of the existing gag order.
Completely gagging the victim from speaking about what had happened to her confers more psychological punishment upon her than to the perpetrators, who will likely be serving time in juvenile detention.
Suggestions by supposed experts were that the victim should spend her own money and resources to fight the decision of the judge, so that she can be allowed to speak to clergy, counselors or others who could render assistance for her probable substance abuse problem, and the accompanying damage from sexual abuse.
Perhaps some feel that a girl who passes out at a party is fair game to all the guys who are incapable of normal sexual relationships. While Dietrich was wrong to place herself in a compromising position, she does not deserve a jail sentence for speaking about the aftermath.
Perhaps if the sexual offenses had been taken seriously, the court would not be considered ‘contemptible’ by the Savannah Dietrich and the general public.
See the video and transcript linked below, in which Obama explains that his promise not to tax the middle class is good, because the mandated purchase of healthcare insurance (soon to be from the government only) is not a tax.
But today, THE SUPREME COURT DIFFERS, and has upheld obamacare with the argument (from Obama’s lawyers) that the mandated health care purchase IS a tax.
So, Middle Class, Obama is taxing the crap out of you, even though he promised not to, and the Supreme Court says he’s allowed to.
Hospital and healthcare stocks went up (for the reason that people don’t understand what Obamacare will eventually do to these entities). Insurance stocks fell, because most investors know that Obamacare is designed to kill them.
Pharmer believes that Republican and Tea Party chances in November have increased due to this decision.
Justice John Roberts move to the left is not really a move, in the eyes of those who have been watching him. Pharmer remembers the left leaning David Souter, who had been expected to be more conservative when he was nominated. We have something similar in Roberts, and can expect further difficulties on account of him.
The reason SCOTUS gives for accepting Obamacare, that Congress is allowed to tax us to death, can become the reason for rejecting most of the incumbents of Congress. It’s time to clean house.
One might say that the media was not expecting the Supreme Court to approve Obama’s NEW TAX on the middle class. See the Gaffes HERE!
Over the preceding months Congress has been amassing a good deal of testimony from various members of the Obama administration concerning the nature of the mandate to purchase health insurance. Even during the time that the Obama lawyers argued in favor of the new tax before the Supreme Court, they were telling us that it was not a tax. Sebelius had the most amusing story… it operates as a tax but it is not a tax.
Not to worry, it will feel like a tax, because you will get little to no return on your “investment”.
A sixty six year old gay rights pioneer, Larry Brinkin, was arrested on Friday, and his computers and software were seized by cops. It seems that his AOL email account had received, and shown return commentary on kiddie porn. It also showed emails sent from Brinkin’s formerly held city email account.
As expected, the 17 Dems of the house committee supported Holder, but the majority of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, is sending the vote to place Holder in contempt of Congress to the full body of the house.
Obama is channeling Nixon, and after denying any knowledge of Fast and Furious, has now claimed executive privilege to conceal the details of the gun running operation.
A Shiner, Texas father is the talk of the country for beating to death a man who was sexually assaulting his four year old daughter.
At the Stir, they’re generating hits by discussing what this man should have done, after the fact.
Given the available information, Pharmer would judge the father as neither a hero nor criminal. Paternal instincts took over, and he beat the man whom he observed assaulting his daughter. The ‘pedophile’ died of his injuries.
The Dad has to live with having seen a horrible thing done to his daughter, and with taking the ‘molester’s’ life during the act of stopping the assault.
(Incidentally, if this man had shot the molester once with a gun and killed him, there would not be the endless discussion of how many times he should have been allowed to hit the perp.)
Fortunately Texas law is reasonable with respect to self defense, and is not likely to add further misery to this family’s life.
Updates: The girl’s age has been corrected to five years. More details on the incident are HERE. Further evidence affirms that the girl was being raped.
News that the father will not be tried for murder is HERE, and remarkably the media is restraining itself from identifying the father and daughter in the case, or trying to turn it into a race war.
Governor Daniels has signed legislation which responds to that decision by allowing Indiana residents to shoot law enforcement officers who unlawfully enter their homes. Senator R. Michael Young authored the legislation in order to provide an avenue of defense for citizens against unlawful use of force by public servants.
From Bloomberg : “Young cited a hypothetical situation of a homeowner returning to see an officer raping his daughter or wife. Under the court’s ruling, the homeowner could not touch the officer and only file a lawsuit later, he said. Young said he devised the idea for the law after the court ruling”
The legislation was opposed by the Indiana State Fraternal order of Police, which imagines that it would make a big difference in what happens to police who are entering a home. The NRA, on the other hand, backed the legislation.
Justice Steven David’s initial term is up in November. The voters have a chance to toss him out.
Mitch Daniels has obviously sought to create some distance between himself and his Supreme court appointee with his approval of this new law.
The U.S. government sent guns to Mexico in order to raise controversy about their use by drug cartels, and use this as an excuse to undermine our Second Amendment rights.
Margaret Forrester, a psychological wellbeing practitioner with the Central and North West London NHS Trust, has filed suit against her employer for breaching her freedom of religion and freedom of speach. Mrs. Forrester was disciplined and suspended after an informal conversation with a colleague during which she presented a booklet and her views that abortion adversely affects the physical and mental health of women.
Mrs. Forrester, a Roman Catholic, is represented by the Thomas More Legal Centre. One of their spokespersons is wondering why the NHS objects to a discussion of abortion among their health service professionals: “If the NHS is not willing to allow the effects of Abortion to be discussed by NHS staff it raises a real question as to what the NHS is afraid of.”
Pharm Guests! Links are in gray text, and you might miss them if your screen is small. They will jump out, in black with underline, as your mouse passes over. Most links open in new tabs.
