Filled with scoops of dirt from the underbelly of the 2012 Presidential Campaign, “Double Down: Game Change 2012” by Mark Halperin and John Heilemann also features a big non-surprise for pro-lifers. We told you all along of Obama’s propensity for killing. One of the dirt nuggets from Game Change, attributed to an Obama aide, is of the president commenting on his drone program, and that he is ‘really good at killing people’. Normally this might be brushed off as hearsay, if we didn’t already know that Obama vigorously defended the practice of infanticide while he was a state senator in Illinois, and that steadfast support of abortion remains the only political promise he has kept.
Yes, drone strikes have made killing as easy for the president as chemical abortion is for Planned Parenthood.
Update:
Check out Tom Blumer’s Roundup of commentary and stats on just how good Obama is at using drones. It’s interesting that his remote controlled killing vastly outstrips Bush’s use of that method. During Obama’s 5 years: drone strikes in Pakistan number 326, in Yemen, 93, and several in Somalia. A total of 52 drone strikes occurred during Bush’s 8 years.
Why do you think you have the right to tell me what I can do with my body?
You have appended your comment to a post which highlights Obama's support of I N F A N T I C I D E.
But we will give the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are attempting to defend abortion.
Why do you think you have the right to make me pay for what you do to your body,
or make me participate in the practice,
or make me help to kill other humans residing within your body?