Rachel Jeantel Revealed a Possible Motive for Trayvon to have Accosted Zimmerman

The federal government has a vested interest in pushing a race war to divide Americans and keep our eyes off their criminal activities in Washington.

What we have learned from one of the jurors in the trial is that race was not pertinent to their deliberations.  We also learned from Trayvon’s friend, Rachel Jeantel, who was on the phone with him during the incident, that race was not a factor in their altercation.

When Trayvon reported to Rachel that he was being followed by a “creepy ass cracka”, she suggested to him that Zimmerman might be some kind of same sex rapist, and told him to run.  Jeantel thought it significant that Trayvon’s little brother was residing with his father  in that neighborhood.

This testimony was given during the trial and again, during  a public interview with Piers Morgan.  You have the opportunity to listen to Rachel HERE. 

Rachel Jeantel interviewed on CNN
Rachel Jeantel interviewed on CNN

What we now know is that Trayvon was not the kind of guy to run away.

Leftist incompetence is on parade.  The Obama administration has chosen to make a race war out of a violent incident between two mixed race guys, and the issue which brought about the violence had nothing to do with their different proportions of Black ancestry.   Rachel tells us that she and  Trayvon thought  that Zimmerman was likely a homosexual rapist.

Which of the two special interest groups, Gays or Blacks,  will be thrown under the bus as the government utilizes the Zimmerman case to push its agenda.

When the video at Mediaite disappears,  the audio remains…….Jeantel interview with Piers Morgan: feared zimmerman was a rapist

Clinton Flip-Flop

Bill Clinton is hailing the Supreme Court decision to overturn portions of the Defense of Marriage Act which HE signed into law in 1996.

Cerebral atherosclerosis and various infectious organisms might have combined to produce this evolution in Clinton’s thinking regarding how we should spend federal dollars, providing benefits to couples who both could have been working all their lives, not supporting children, thereby having more opportunity to accrue their own retirement funds and individual health plans.

By the way, this SCOTUS  decision  affects only the way the Federal government looks at gay marriage, and not how the states view it, with the exception of vacating a court appeal supporting Prop 8 in California.  It’s not as big a deal as some might think.

What do you think should be the next move for churches, which  will need to protect their First Amendment rights to oppose homosexual Activity on a moral basis?  Obama assures us that HE will not force churches to officiate gay marriages.  Like all of his other social agendas…….. someone else will do the forcing for him.

**The Supreme court vacated the 9th Circuit Court decision on California’s Prop 8, so that restriction on homosexual marriage  remains the law of the land in that state.  The federal court takes no position on the states decisions regarding same sex marriage.   Any further attempts to appeal Prop 8 will have to take place in the California state court system.

Leftists Move to Undo Laws Against Sex with Minors

Obvious to many is the leftist policy push towards making children more available to adults for sex.   That which would be considered statutory rape in the United States is touted in the film “Blue is the Warmest Colour” which is three hours of footage featuring an adult woman using up a 15 year old girl.

At the same time, we find that an 18 year old female, Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt,  in Florida, has been having a lesbian relationship with a  14 year old girl.  Because of their sexual orientation, people seem to feel that the 18 year old should not pay the penalty that any other adult would pay in Florida, for having sex with a juvenile.

The leftists hope to use this case in their quest to kill the idea that adults should not have sex with children.

On the Boy Scouts Specifically Admitting Gay Boys

There’s big news about the Boy Scouts admitting gay C H I L D R E N to their organization. First of all, this is strange because the sex preferences should not even be a big deal during childhood. The organization is temporarily excluding gay scout leaders, but this policy will quickly be overturned by including the government oversight by means of a discrimination lawsuit.

Taking this issue on more globally, this burning question needs to be asked: Why does every single group have to concern itself with the sex lives of its members?

When there is a policy to specifically admit people who advertise where they like to put it, then that issue becomes part of the function of the group, and those preferences must be rubber stamped by every member of the group.

Making an issue of everyone’s sex preferences, adds sex as a primary function of every group. Each time sex invades and is placed at the top of group priorities, a new group will have to form which excludes sex as a part of their mission. This kind if segregation will occur until the government makes it illegal to “think” that there is a proper and improper way to have sex.

People are willing to give up every single other freedom in order to have completely unfettered sex practices, ‘whenever and wherever’. This idea of “freedom” has come to include the sexual abuse of children and animals.
The disorder of America, and a major reason that it is in the death spiral is that the sex preferences have become more important than any other aspect of life.

Hitler’s Doctors Said He had Homosexual Tendencies

An Army Interrogator, Herman Merl, a medical technician from Vienna, interviewed Adolf Hitler’s personal physicians, Karl Brandt and Theodor Morell.  In the resultant assessment of Hitler’s sexuality, Merl scribbled “Homosex”, says the Washington Examiner.

Merl’s other notes:   “Eva Braun = separate rooms”. “Female hormone- injection 50,000 units”
“His sexual life and intercourse with Eva Braun was told to me.”

The records also mention Hitler’s hysteria, megalomania, flatulence, and that he had been injected with bull semen.  (That would have created quite a negative physiological reaction.)

Merl’s 5 notebooks will be up for sale at Alexander Historical Auctions of Chesapeake City, MD.

Students Who Want Sex Change Should Apply to Duke

Duke University has jacked up the fees  for all students in order to offer payment for sex change surgeries for students.  This will now be covered up to $50,000 dollars.

This puts Duke University on the list of nearly 40  universities which cover sex change operations.

Students who are anticipating such a change in their life should strongly consider applying to  a school on this list of universities, of which Duke counts itself near the top.  Those who do not feel that they can afford  to contribute to sex change surgery can also opt to avoid this expense.

Brown University
California Institute of Technology
Carnegie Mellon University
Case Western University
Colorado State University
Cornell University

Duke University
Emerson College
Emory University
Harvard University
New York University
Northwestern University
Portland State University
Stanford University
Stony Brook University
University at Buffalo
University of California, Berkeley
University of California, Davis
University of California, Hastings College of the Law
University of California, Irvine
University of California, Los Angeles
University of California, Merced
University of California, Riverside
University of California, San Diego
University of California, San Francisco
University of California, Santa Barbara
University of California, Santa Cruz
University of Colorado, Boulder
University of Connecticut
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
University of Michigan
University of Minnesota
University of Missouri
University of Oregon
University of Pennsylvania
University of Vermont
University of Washington
Washington University in St. Louis

 Transgenderlaw.org also lists Universities which only pay for the hormonal support/maintenance of sex changes for students.

Extra issues to consider:  Sexual ambiguity as a congenital malformation has risen with the use of hormonal birth control.  Those children with such physiological difficulties currently receive medical assistance much earlier in life.  This is particularly true of the population which has access to college education.

Obama Should have Stayed on the Golf Course

It seems that when Obama gets out in public, it’s not all unicorns, rainbows and fainting fans anymore.   He’s experienced some audience dissatisfaction over the Easter weekend.  At Port of Miami, he gave a speech which received some negative response.   On the following Saturday, Obama appeared with his good buddy Reggie, at  an NCAA final 8 playoff, after some time on the golf course.   He was booed vigorously when the cameras focused on his visage and pasted him up on the monitors.Obama and his date at ncaa games 2013

Putin Bans Foriegn Same Sex Couples from Adopting Russian Children

A new edict from Vladimir Putin comes on the heels of France’s approval of same sex marriage.  He’s banning foriegn same sex couples from adopting Russian babies.  This is actually self consistent with the internal rules banning gay marriage, and banning unmarried people from adopting within Russia.

It follows the ban on Russian adoptions by any U.S. citizens.

None of the above should come as a surprise from a country which has been battling under-production of new citizens for many years.   The population of native Russians is shrinking.   The government has been trying various incentives to inspire Russian citizens to make more babies.

A Gay Adult Has Poked REALITY Through the Noise

The debate on homosexual marriage has been largly been reduced to a gluey morass of useless emotions.  For this reason it is refreshing when  a useful and cogent view on the topic pushes through the noise and garbage.

Yours truly has long recognized that social recognition of marriage is not for the couple getting married.  Instead, society has recognized marriage as a vehicle for stabilizing and promoting the process of bringing up children.   Marriage as an institution is much closer to a “childrens rights” issue.   There really is really no right for any individual to be married, nor is there a right to be a parent.  The rights of an individual stop where they impinge upon the rights of another.   Marriage is a whole lot of impingement and, as such, it is a privilege, not a right.

Please attend to the writings of one Mr. Doug Mainwaring, a Tea Party leader, who opposes gay marriage with similar arguments.   As a conscientious adult, (an increasingly rare type of individual) Mr. Mainwaring is putting the rights of others ahead of what might be his own social comfort.   He is likely paying a higher immediate social price for his opposition to same sex marriage because he himself is gay.  The left tends to insist that all gays think a certain way, and it can be as bad for the conservatives among them as it is for Black right wingers.

Mr. Mainwaring  points out that politicians are selling this issue, disguised as a push for equality, for votes, and  says that the same sex marriage concept is undefining marriage instead of redefining it.   He points out that in the quest for self gratification, adults are reducing children to “chattel like sources of self fulfillment“.   He eloquently  conveys the fact that the state’s  interest in marriage is all about the children, and nothing more.  Check out his article HERE.

Find more thoughts HERE.